Study2017
Red meat: another inconvenient truth
Godlee F
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 0 citations
Review labels
Funding not disclosedLumps processed with unprocessed meatNo stated lifestyle adjustment
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2017-05-11 · BMJ · vol. 357 · p. j2278
- Cited
- 1 citation · more than 63% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
- References
- 0 works
- Access
- Free to read
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Confusion, Consumption (sociology), Epidemiology, Association (psychology), Red meat, Environmental health, Population, Medicine, Cohort study, Demography, Psychology, Pathology, Sociology, Social science
- MeSH
- humans, diet, cause of death, red meat
1 author
- Fiona Godlee · correspondingBMJ Group (United Kingdom)
Abstract
Europe PMC has no abstract for this paper. Open the source to read it.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
0 · not at all10 · completely
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.