Study2017

Effect of age, diet, and tissue type on PCr response to creatine supplementation

Solis MY, Artioli GG, Otaduy MCG, Leite CDC, Arruda W, Veiga RR, Gualano B

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 42 citations

Review labels

Mechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Government
São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
Grants
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2014/06911-9)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2017-06-01 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 123 · issue 2 · pp. 407–414
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
69 citations · more than 82% of similar papers · 1.7× the field average
References
52 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Creatine, Phosphocreatine, Internal medicine, Omnivore, Creatine kinase, Endocrinology, Muscle tissue, Placebo, Medicine, Biology, Physiology, Energy metabolism, Pathology
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, brain, humans, creatine, phosphocreatine, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diet, single-blind method, dietary supplements, adult, aged, child, female, male

7 authors

From BR, GB

  • Marina Yázigi SolisUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Guilherme Giannini ArtioliUniversidade de São Paulo; Nottingham Trent University
  • Maria Concepción García OtaduyUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Cláudia da Costa LeiteUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Walquiria ArrudaCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas
  • Raquel Ramos VeigaCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas

Abstract

Creatine/phosphorylcreatine (PCr) responses to creatine supplementation may be modulated by age, diet, and tissue, but studies assessing this possibility are lacking. Therefore we aimed to determine whether PCr responses vary as a function of age, diet, and tissue. Fifteen children, 17 omnivorous and 14 vegetarian adults, and 18 elderly individuals ("elderly") participated in this study. Participants were given placebo and subsequently creatine (0.3 g·kg-1·day-1) for 7 days in a single-blind fashion. PCr was measured through phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) in muscle and brain. Creatine supplementation increased muscle PCr in children (P P P = 0.3348). Elderly had greater PCr increases than children and omnivores (P P = 0.0022). In relation to diet, vegetarians (P P -1·day-1 for 7 days) may be affected by age, diet, and tissue. Whereas creatine supplementation was able to increase muscle PCr in all groups, although to different extents, brain PCr was shown to be unresponsive overall. These findings demonstrate the need to tailor creatine protocols to optimize creatine/PCr accumulation both in muscle and in brain, enabling a better appreciation of the pleiotropic properties of creatine.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A standardized creatine supplementation protocol (0.3 g·kg-1·day-1 for 7 days) effectively increased muscle, but not brain, phosphorylcreatine. Older participants responded better than younger participants whereas vegetarians responded better than omnivores. Responses to supplementation are thus dependent on age, tissue, and diet. This suggests that a single "universal" protocol, originally designed for increasing muscle creatine in young individuals, may lead to heterogeneous muscle responses in different populations or even no responses in tissues other than skeletal muscle.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.