Caffeine ingestion enhances Wingate performance: a meta-analysis
Grgic J
European journal of sport science · 116 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2017-10-31 · Eur J Sport Sci · vol. 18 · issue 2 · pp. 219–225
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Cited
- 168 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 10.7× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 34 works
- Access
- Open access (repository copy)
- Research areas
- Coffee research and impacts · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- Wingate test, Meta-analysis, Strictly standardized mean difference, Caffeine, Anaerobic exercise, Placebo, Confidence interval, Medicine, Ingestion, Checklist, Physical therapy, Internal medicine, Psychology
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, caffeine, exercise test, bicycling
1 author
From AU
- Jozo Grgić · correspondingVictoria University
Abstract
The positive effects of caffeine ingestion on aerobic performance are well-established; however, recent findings are suggesting that caffeine ingestion might also enhance components of anaerobic performance. A commonly used test of anaerobic performance and power output is the 30-second Wingate test. Several studies explored the effects of caffeine ingestion on Wingate performance, with equivocal findings. To elucidate this topic, this paper aims to determine the effects of caffeine ingestion on Wingate performance using meta-analytic statistical techniques. Following a search through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and SportDiscus®, 16 studies were found meeting the inclusion criteria (pooled number of participants = 246). Random-effects meta-analysis of standardized mean differences (SMD) for peak power output and mean power output was performed. Study quality was assessed using the modified version of the PEDro checklist. Results of the meta-analysis indicated a significant difference (p = .005) between the placebo and caffeine trials on mean power output with SMD values of small magnitude (0.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.05, 0.31; +3%). The meta-analysis performed for peak power output indicated a significant difference (p = .006) between the placebo and caffeine trials (SMD = 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.08, 0.47 [moderate magnitude]; +4%). The results from the PEDro checklist indicated that, in general, studies are of good and excellent methodological quality. This meta-analysis adds on to the current body of evidence showing that caffeine ingestion can also enhance components of anaerobic performance. The results presented herein may be helpful for developing more efficient evidence-based recommendations regarding caffeine supplementation.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.