Controlled clinical trial2018

Circulating Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Bone Mineral Density: Mendelian Randomization Study

Larsson SC, Melhus H, Michaëlsson K

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 41 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Government
Medical Research Council
Grants
Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-01-16 · J Bone Miner Res · vol. 33 · issue 5 · pp. 840–844
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
53 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 4.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
50 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Folate and B Vitamins Research
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, Bone mineral, Medicine, Femoral neck, Internal medicine, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Vitamin D and neurology, Osteoporosis, Endocrinology, Parathyroid hormone, Bone density, Biology, Genetics, Genotype, Calcium, Genetic variants
MeSH
femur neck, lumbar vertebrae, humans, vitamin d, absorptiometry, photon, bone density, polymorphism, single nucleotide, female, male, mendelian randomization analysis

3 authors

From SE

  • Susanna C. Larsson · correspondingKarolinska Institutet
  • Håkan MelhusUppsala University
  • Karl MichaëlssonUppsala University

Abstract

There is considerable discussion of the importance for increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (S-25OHD) concentration associated with adequacy for bone health. Accordingly, whether long-term high S-25OHD concentration in general positively affects bone mineral density (BMD) is uncertain. We used a Mendelian randomization design to determine the association between genetically increased S-25OHD concentrations and BMD. Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or near genes encoding enzymes and carrier proteins involved in vitamin D synthesis or metabolism were used as instrumental variables to genetically predict 1 standard deviation increase in S-25OHD concentration. Summary statistics data for the associations of the S-25OHD-associated SNPs with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD were obtained from the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium (32,965 individuals) and ultrasound-derived heel estimated BMD from the UK Biobank (142,487 individuals). None of the SNPs were associated with BMD at Bonferroni-corrected significance level, but there was a suggestive association between rs6013897 near CYP24A1 and femoral neck BMD (p = 0.01). In Mendelian randomization analysis, genetically predicted 1 standard deviation increment of S-25OHD was not associated with higher femoral neck BMD (SD change in BMD 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.03 to 0.07; p = 0.37), lumbar spine BMD (SD change in BMD 0.02; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.08; p = 0.49), or estimated BMD (g/cm2 change in BMD -0.03; 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; p = 0.02). This study does not support a causal association between long-term elevated S-25OHD concentrations and higher BMD in generally healthy populations. These results suggest that more emphasis should be placed on the development of evidence-based cut-off points for vitamin D inadequacy rather than a general recommendation to increase S-25OHD. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.