Ethanol potentiates the genotoxicity of the food-derived mammary carcinogen PhIP in human estrogen receptor-positive mammary cells: mechanistic support for lifestyle factors (cooked red meat and ethanol) associated with mammary cancer
Malik DE, David RM, Gooderham NJ
Archives of toxicology · 12 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- In vitro/mechanistic study (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- Cells or lab samples
- Main outcome
- Mechanisms only
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
Based on full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2018-01-23 · Arch Toxicol · vol. 92 · issue 4 · pp. 1639–1655
- Publisher
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Cited
- 17 citations · more than 61% of similar papers · 0.7× the field average
- References
- 92 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment · Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Genotoxicity, Chemistry, Carcinogen, Estrogen receptor, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor, Micronucleus test, Toxicity, Oxidative stress, Pharmacology, DNA damage, CYP1B1, Mammary tumor, Comet assay, Biochemistry, Internal medicine, Breast cancer, Cytochrome P450, Cancer, Metabolism, Biology, Medicine, DNA
- MeSH
- humans, breast neoplasms, dna damage, reactive oxygen species, ethanol, imidazoles, cytochrome p-450 cyp2e1, estrogen receptor alpha, carcinogens, life style, oxidative stress, female, mcf-7 cells, cytochrome p-450 cyp1b1, red meat
3 authors
From GB, SG, PL
- Durr-e-shahwar MalikImperial College London
- Rhiannon M. DavidAstraZeneca (United Kingdom); AstraZeneca (Singapore); AstraZeneca (Poland); Imperial College London
- Nigel J. Gooderham · correspondingImperial College London
Abstract
Consumption of cooked/processed meat and ethanol are lifestyle risk factors in the aetiology of breast cancer. Cooking meat generates heterocyclic amines such as 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Epidemiology, mechanistic and animal studies indicate that PhIP is a mammary carcinogen that could be causally linked to breast cancer incidence; PhIP is DNA damaging, mutagenic and oestrogenic. PhIP toxicity involves cytochrome P450 (CYP1 family)-mediated metabolic activation to DNA-damaging species, and transcriptional responses through Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and estrogen-receptor-α (ER-α). Ethanol consumption is a modifiable lifestyle factor strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Ethanol toxicity involves alcohol dehydrogenase metabolism to reactive acetaldehyde, and is also a substrate for CYP2E1, which when uncoupled generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and DNA damage. Here, using human mammary cells that differ in estrogen-receptor status, we explore genotoxicity of PhIP and ethanol and mechanisms behind this toxicity. Treatment with PhIP (10-7-10-4 M) significantly induced genotoxicity (micronuclei formation) preferentially in ER-α positive human mammary cell lines (MCF-7, ER-α+) compared to MDA-MB-231 (ER-α-) cells. PhIP-induced CYP1A2 in both cell lines but CYP1B1 was selectively induced in ER-α(+) cells. ER-α inhibition in MCF-7 cells attenuated PhIP-mediated micronuclei formation and CYP1B1 induction. PhIP-induced CYP2E1 and ROS via ER-α-STAT-3 pathway, but only in ER-α (+) MCF-7 cells. Importantly, simultaneous treatments of physiological concentrations ethanol (10-3-10-1 M) with PhIP (10-7-10-4 M) increased oxidative stress and genotoxicity in MCF-7 cells, compared to the individual chemicals. Collectively, these data offer a mechanistic basis for the increased risk of breast cancer associated with dietary cooked meat and ethanol lifestyle choices.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.