Systematic review2018Open access

The Differential Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review

Innes JK, Calder PC

International journal of molecular sciences · 139 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2018-02-09 · Int J Mol Sci · vol. 19 · issue 2 · p. 532
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
206 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 5.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
95 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology · Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
Docosahexaenoic acid, Eicosapentaenoic acid, Systematic review, Medicine, Bioinformatics, MEDLINE, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Biology, Polyunsaturated fatty acid, Fatty acid
MeSH
humans, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, hypoglycemic agents, antioxidants, randomized controlled trials as topic, metabolic syndrome

2 authors

From GB

  • Jacqueline K. InnesUniversity of Southampton
  • Philip C. Calder · correspondingUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; National Institute for Health and Care Research; University of Southampton

Abstract

A large body of evidence supports the cardioprotective effects of the long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). There is increasing interest in the independent effects of EPA and DHA in the modulation of cardiometabolic risk factors. This systematic review aims to appraise the latest available evidence of the differential effects of EPA and DHA on such risk factors. A systematic literature review was conducted up to May 2017. Randomised controlled trials were included if they met strict eligibility criteria, including EPA or DHA > 2 g/day and purity ≥ 90%. Eighteen identified articles were included, corresponding to six unique studies involving 527 participants. Both EPA and DHA lowered triglyceride concentration, with DHA having a greater triglyceride-lowering effect. Whilst total cholesterol levels were largely unchanged by EPA and DHA, DHA increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration, particularly HDL₂, and increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration and LDL particle size. Both EPA and DHA inhibited platelet activity, whilst DHA improved vascular function and lowered heart rate and blood pressure to a greater extent than EPA. The effects of EPA and DHA on inflammatory markers and glycaemic control were inconclusive; however both lowered oxidative stress. Thus, EPA and DHA appear to have differential effects on cardiometabolic risk factors, but these need to be confirmed by larger clinical studies.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.