Meta-analysis2018

High versus standard dose caffeine for apnoea: a systematic review

Vliegenthart R, Miedema M, Hutten GJ, van Kaam AH, Onland W

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 36 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2018-02-07 · Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed · vol. 103 · issue 6 · pp. F523–F529
Publisher
BMJ
Cited
50 citations · more than 82% of similar papers · 1.6× the field average
References
38 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · OTHER-OA
Research areas
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research · Neuroscience of respiration and sleep · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
Caffeine, Medicine, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Placebo, Randomized controlled trial, Dose, Meta-analysis, Regimen, Pediatrics, Theophylline, Systematic review, Gestational age, MEDLINE, Internal medicine, Pregnancy
MeSH
humans, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, apnea, infant, premature, diseases, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, treatment outcome, infant mortality, dose-response relationship, drug, infant, infant, newborn, infant, premature

5 authors

From NL

  • Roos J. S. Vliegenthart · correspondingAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; Emma Kinderziekenhuis
  • Martijn MiedemaAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; Emma Kinderziekenhuis
  • Gerard J. HuttenAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; Emma Kinderziekenhuis
  • Anton H. van KaamAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; Emma Kinderziekenhuis
  • Wes OnlandAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; Emma Kinderziekenhuis

Abstract

Background

Placebo-controlled trials have shown that caffeine is highly effective in treating apnoea of prematurity and reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI).

Objective

To identify, appraise and summarise studies investigating the modulating effect of different caffeine dosages.

Methods

A systematic review identified all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a high versus a standard caffeine treatment regimen in infants with a gestational age <32 weeks, by searching the main electronic databases and abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies. Studies comparing caffeine to placebo or theophylline only were excluded. Primary outcomes were BPD and mortality at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Secondary key-outcome was neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 and 24 months corrected age. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

Six RCTs including 620 infants were identified. Meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in BPD, the combined outcome BPD or mortality, and failure to extubate in infants allocated to a higher caffeine dose. No differences were found in mortality alone and NDI. The quality of the outcome measures were deemed low to very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

Conclusions

Although this review suggests that administering a higher dose of caffeine might enhance its beneficial effect on death or BPD, firm recommendations on the optimal caffeine dose cannot be given due to the low level of evidence. A large RCT is urgently needed to confirm or refute these findings and determine the optimal dose of caffeine.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.