Systematic review2019

Heat stress and fetal risk. Environmental limits for exercise and passive heat stress during pregnancy: a systematic review with best evidence synthesis

Ravanelli N, Casasola W, English T, Edwards KM, Jay O

British journal of sports medicine · 53 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
University of Ottawa
Government
Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-03-01 · Br J Sports Med · vol. 53 · issue 13 · pp. 799–805
Publisher
BMJ
Cited
96 citations · more than 70% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
References
83 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
Medicine, CINAHL, Pregnancy, Hyperthermia, Heat stress, Meta-analysis, Gestation, Core (optical fiber), Physical therapy, Obstetrics, Internal medicine, Psychological intervention, Animal science
MeSH
humans, heat stress disorders, body temperature, treatment outcome, exercise, body temperature regulation, heat-shock response, pregnancy, female, teratogenesis

5 authors

From AU, CA, GB

  • Nicholas RavanelliThe University of Sydney; University of Ottawa
  • William CasasolaThe University of Sydney; University of Exeter
  • Timothy EnglishThe University of Sydney
  • Kate M. EdwardsThe University of Sydney
  • Ollie Jay · correspondingThe University of Sydney; University of Ottawa

Abstract

Objective

Pregnant women are advised to avoid heat stress (eg, excessive exercise and/or heat exposure) due to the risk of teratogenicity associated with maternal hyperthermia; defined as a core temperature (Tcore) ≥39.0°C. However, guidelines are ambiguous in terms of critical combinations of climate and activity to avoid and may therefore unnecessarily discourage physical activity during pregnancy. Thus, the primary aim was to assess Tcore elevations with different characteristics defining exercise and passive heat stress (intensity, mode, ambient conditions, duration) during pregnancy relative to the critical maternal Tcore of ≥39.0°C.

Design

Systematic review with best evidence synthesis.

Data sources

EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from inception to 12 July 2017.

Study eligibility criteria

Studies reporting the Tcore response of pregnant women, at any period of gestation, to exercise or passive heat stress, were included.

Results

12 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria (n=347). No woman exceeded a Tcore of 39.0°C. The highest Tcore was 38.9°C, reported during land-based exercise. The highest mean end-trial Tcore was 38.3°C (95% CI 37.7°C to 38.9°C) for land-based exercise, 37.5°C (95% CI 37.3°C to 37.7°C) for water immersion exercise, 36.9°C (95% CI 36.8°C to 37.0°C) for hot water bathing and 37.6°C (95% CI 37.5°C to 37.7°C) for sauna exposure.

Conclusion

The highest individual core temperature reported was 38.9°C. Immediately after exercise (either land based or water immersion), the highest mean core temperature was 38.3°C; 0.7°C below the proposed teratogenic threshold. Pregnant women can safely engage in: (1) exercise for up to 35 min at 80%-90% of their maximum heart rate in 25°C and 45% relative humidity (RH); (2) water immersion (≤33.4°C) exercise for up to 45 min; and (3) sitting in hot baths (40°C) or hot/dry saunas (70°C; 15% RH) for up to 20 min, irrespective of pregnancy stage, without reaching a core temperature exceeding the teratogenic threshold.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.