Randomized controlled trial2018

25-Hydroxyvitamin D Threshold for the Effects of Vitamin D Supplements on Bone Density: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Macdonald HM, Reid IR, Gamble GD, Fraser WD, Tang JC, Wood AD

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 85 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Nonprofit
National Osteoporosis Society
Government
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Government
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Government
Medical Research Council
Grants
Health Research Council of New Zealand (15-576)

Based on 5 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-04-17 · J Bone Miner Res · vol. 33 · issue 8 · pp. 1464–1469
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
122 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 10.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
20 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
Medicine, Vitamin D and neurology, Bone mineral, Placebo, Osteomalacia, Parathyroid hormone, Internal medicine, Osteoporosis, Randomized controlled trial, Bone density, Endocrinology, vitamin D deficiency, Bone remodeling, Vitamin, Calcium
MeSH
hip, spine, humans, parathyroid hormone, vitamin d, bone density, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female

6 authors

From GB, NZ

  • Helen M. MacdonaldUniversity of Aberdeen
  • Ian R. Reid · correspondingUniversity of Auckland; Auckland District Health Board
  • Gregory D. GambleUniversity of Auckland
  • William Duncan FraserUniversity of East Anglia
  • JONATHAN C. Y. TANGUniversity of East Anglia
  • Adrian D. WoodUniversity of Aberdeen

Abstract

Most trials of vitamin D supplementation have shown no benefits on bone mineral density (BMD), although severe vitamin D deficiency causes osteomalacia, which is associated with profound BMD deficits. Recently, the ViDA-BMD study from New Zealand demonstrated a threshold of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD; 30 nmol/L) below which vitamin D supplementation did benefit BMD. We have now reexamined data from a similar trial in Aberdeen to determine whether a baseline 25OHD threshold of 30 nmol/L is also observed in that database. The Aberdeen study recruited 305 postmenopausal women in late winter and randomized them to receive placebo, vitamin D 400 IU/d, or vitamin D 1000 IU/d over 1 year. As previously reported, BMD loss at the hip was reduced by vitamin D 1000 IU/d only, and there was no significant treatment effect of either dose at the lumbar spine. In the present analysis, when the trial participants were grouped according to whether their baseline 25OHD was ≤30 nmol/L or above this threshold, significant treatment effects were apparent at both the spine and hip in those with baseline 25OHD ≤30 nmol/L, but no significant effects were apparent in those with baseline 25OHD above this level. There was evidence of a similar threshold for effects on parathyroid hormone, but no groups showed changes in bone turnover markers during the study. It is concluded that vitamin D supplements only increase bone density in adults with nadir 25OHD ≤30 nmol/L. This moves us further toward a trial-based definition of vitamin D deficiency in adults with adequate calcium intakes and suggests that supplement use should be targeted accordingly. Future trials of vitamin D supplementation should focus on individuals with 25OHD concentrations in this range. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.