Cross-sectional study2018

Ultra-processed food consumption and excess weight among US adults

Juul F, Martinez-Steele E, Parekh N, Monteiro CA, Chang VW

The British journal of nutrition · 294 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2018-05-05 · Br J Nutr · vol. 120 · issue 1 · pp. 90–100
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
488 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 41.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
38 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
Waist, Medicine, Obesity, Abdominal obesity, Anthropometry, Odds ratio, Body mass index, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Logistic regression, Cross-sectional study, Overweight, Odds, Demography, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Population
MeSH
humans, obesity, body weight, anthropometry, body mass index, diet, nutrition surveys, prevalence, multivariate analysis, cross-sectional studies, feeding behavior, energy intake, adult, middle aged, united states, female, overweight, young adult, obesity, abdominal, fast foods

5 authors

From US, BR

  • Filippa JuulNew York University
  • Eurídice Martínez SteeleUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Niyati ParekhNew York University
  • Carlos Augusto MonteiroUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Virginia W. Chang · correspondingNew York University

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods provide 58 % of energy intake and 89 % of added sugars in the American diet. Nevertheless, the association between ultra-processed foods and excess weight has not been investigated in a US sample. The present investigation therefore aims to examine the association between ultra-processed foods and excess weight in a nationally representative sample of US adults. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of anthropometric and dietary data from 15 977 adults (20-64 years) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2014. Dietary data were collected by 24-h recall. Height, weight and waist circumference (WC) were measured. Foods were classified as ultra-processed/non-ultra-processed according to the NOVA classification. Multivariable linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between ultra-processed food consumption (% energy) and BMI, WC and odds of BMI≥25 kg/m2, BMI≥30 kg/m2 and abdominal obesity (men: WC≥102 cm, women: WC≥88 cm). Prevalence of BMI≥25 kg/m2, BMI≥30 kg/m2 and abdominal obesity was 69·2, 36·1 and 53·0 %, respectively. Consuming ≥74·2 v. ≤36·5 % of total energy from ultra-processed foods was associated with 1·61 units higher BMI (95 % CI 1·11, 2·10), 4·07 cm greater WC (95 % CI 2·94, 5·19) and 48, 53 and 62 % higher odds of BMI≥25 kg/m2, BMI≥30 kg/m2 and abdominal obesity, respectively (OR 1·48; 95 % CI 1·25, 1·76; OR 1·53; 95 % CI 1·29, 1·81; OR 1·62; 95 % CI 1·39, 1·89, respectively; P for trend<0·001 for all). A significant interaction between being female and ultra-processed food consumption was found for BMI (F 4,79=4·89, P=0·002), WC (F 4,79=3·71, P=0·008) and BMI≥25 kg/m2 (F 4,79=5·35, P<0·001). As the first study in a US population, our findings support that higher consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with excess weight, and that the association is more pronounced among women.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.