Study2018Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by Egg Nutrition Center

Egg Consumption in Infants is Associated with Longer Recumbent Length and Greater Intake of Several Nutrients Essential in Growth and Development

Papanikolaou Y, Fulgoni VL

Nutrients · 29 citations

Review labels

Author industry tiesIndustry fundedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Industry group
Egg Nutrition Center
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2018-06-04 · Nutrients · vol. 10 · issue 6 · p. 719
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
51 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
References
21 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
Nutrient, Animal science, Medicine, Food science, Biology, Ecology
MeSH
humans, body height, diet, nutrition surveys, nutrition assessment, feeding behavior, child development, age factors, energy intake, nutritional status, nutritive value, eggs, child, preschool, infant, united states, female, male, infant nutritional physiological phenomena, recommended dietary allowances

2 authors

From US

  • Yanni Papanikolaou · correspondingNutritional Research Foundation
  • Victor L. Fulgoni

Abstract

Nutrient intake during infancy is critical for healthy growth and development. The present study examined egg consumption and associations with nutrient intakes, markers of growth and weight-related measures in infants 6⁻24 months of age (N = 561) compared to infant egg non-consumers (N = 2129). Egg consumers were defined as those infants consuming eggs (i.e., with the exclusion of mixed dishes) during a 24-h dietary recall. Associations with nutrient intakes and markers of growth variables were evaluated using data from What We Eat in America, the dietary component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001⁻2012. Mean energy and nutrient intakes were adjusted for the sample design using appropriate survey parameters and sample weights. Egg consumption was associated with greater energy intake compared to infants not consuming eggs (1265 ± 27 vs. 1190 ± 14 kcal/day; p = 0.01). Infant consumers of eggs also had greater protein (48 ± 0.7 vs. 41 ± 0.4 g/day), total choline (281 ± 6 vs. 163 ± 2 mg/day), lutein + zeaxanthin (788 ± 64 vs. 533 ± 23 mcg/day), α-linolenic acid (0.87 ± 0.02 vs. 0.82 ± 0.01 g/day), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (0.04 ± 0.02 vs. 0.02 ± 0.001 g/day), vitamin B12 (4.2 ± 0.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 mcg/day), phosphorus (977 ± 15 vs. 903 ± 8 mg/day), and selenium (67 ± 1 vs. 52 ± 0.6 mcg/day; all p-values p-values p = 0.03). No associations were observed when comparing body weight. When compared to non-consumers of eggs and regardless of food security, poverty-income-ratio and Women, Infants and Children (WIC) supplemental nutrition status, egg consumption was associated with greater lutein + zeaxanthin intake per day. The current analyzes show that consumption of eggs in infant 6⁻24 months of age is linked with several nutrient intakes, including higher protein, lutein + zeaxanthin, choline, B12, selenium and phosphorus; and lower added and total sugars relative to non-consumers. Egg consumers also have less of several nutrients to be encouraged and a higher intake of nutrients to limit, thus presenting opportunities for educational strategies to potentially increase consumption of nutrient-dense foods in combination with eggs.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.