Randomized controlled trial2018Open access

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Enhanced Wild Blueberry Powder and Wild Blueberry Extract (ThinkBlue™) in Maintenance of Episodic and Working Memory in Older Adults

Whyte AR, Cheng N, Fromentin E, Williams CM

Nutrients · 103 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2018-05-23 · Nutrients · vol. 10 · issue 6 · p. 660
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
128 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 8.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection · Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Placebo, Randomized controlled trial, Episodic memory, Population, Medicine, Working memory, Mood, Cognitive decline, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, Cognition, Blood pressure, Physical therapy, Audiology, Internal medicine, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Dementia, Pathology
MeSH
humans, fruit, nootropic agents, plant extracts, powders, treatment outcome, phytotherapy, geriatric assessment, double-blind method, affect, cognition, memory, short-term, neuropsychological tests, age factors, time factors, aged, aged, 80 and over, england, female, male, executive function, memory, episodic, cognitive aging, blueberry plants

4 authors

From GB, US

  • Adrian Robert WhyteUniversity of Reading
  • Nancy ChengUniversity of Reading
  • Emilie FromentinThe Nature Conservancy
  • Claire Michelle Williams · correspondingUniversity of Reading

Abstract

Previous research has shown beneficial effects of polyphenol-rich diets in ameliorating cognitive decline in aging adults. Here, using a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled chronic intervention, we investigated the effect of two proprietary blueberry formulations on cognitive performance in older adults; a whole wild blueberry powder at 500 mg (WBP500) and 1000 mg (WBP1000) and a purified extract at 100 mg (WBE111). One hundred and twenty-two older adults (65⁻80 years) were randomly allocated to a 6-month, daily regimen of either placebo or one of the three interventions. Participants were tested at baseline, 3, and 6 months on a battery of cognitive tasks targeting episodic memory, working memory and executive function, alongside mood and cardiovascular health parameters. Linear mixed model analysis found intervention to be a significant predictor of delayed word recognition on the Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT), with simple contrast analysis revealing significantly better performance following WBE111 at 3 months. Similarly, performance on the Corsi Block task was predicted by treatment, with simple contrast analysis revealing a trend for better performance at 3 months following WBE111. Treatment also significantly predicted systolic blood pressure (SBP) with simple contrast analysis revealing lower SBP following intervention with WBE111 in comparison to placebo. These results indicate 3 months intervention with WBE111 can facilitate better episodic memory performance in an elderly population and reduce cardiovascular risk factors over 6 months.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.