[Interaction between dietary cholesterol intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus]
Shen JX, Guo LL, Ru SH, Wang Y, Li M, Wu WW, Feng YL, Zhang P, Yang HL, Wang SP, Zhang YW
Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi · 1 citation
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2018-06-10 · Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi · vol. 39 · issue 6 · pp. 830–835
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Cited
- 1 citation · more than 61% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
- References
- 0 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies · Birth, Development, and Health
- Keywords
- Medicine, Pregnancy, Quartile, Gestational diabetes, Logistic regression, Cholesterol, Dietary Cholesterol, Diabetes mellitus, Obstetrics, Gestation, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, diabetes, gestational, cholesterol, dietary, logistic models, risk factors, pregnancy, pregnancy trimester, first, pregnancy trimester, second, adolescent, adult, female, asian people
11 authors
From CN
- Jiaxin ShenShanxi Medical University
- Lingling GuoShanxi Medical University
- Shouhang RuShanxi Medical University
- Ying WangShanxi Medical University
- Mei LiShanxi Medical University
- Weiwei WuShanxi Medical University
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influence of dietary cholesterol intake on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), at one year prior to and first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Methods: Between March 2012 and September 2016, the pregnant women from the First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were asked to fill in a set of questionnaires, by which information on general demographic characteristics, diagnosis of GDM and dietary cholesterol intake was collected. Unconditional logistic regression method was used to analyze the influence of dietary cholesterol intake on GDM, at one year prior to and first and second trimesters of pregnancy. The association on dietary cholesterol intake and GDM between age groups was also analyzed. Results: Data on 9 005 subjects, including 1 388 pregnant women with GDM, was collected. When the amount of cholesterol intake was stratified into quartile, results from the unconditional logistic regression showed that dietary cholesterol intake appeared ≥76.50 mg/d, both in the periods of one year prior to and the second trimester of pregnancy. This amount of dietary cholesterol intake would increase the risk of GDM (one year prior to pregnant: OR=1.230, 95%CI: 1.018-1.485; second trimester: OR=1.228, 95%CI:1.014- 1.486). Women who took ≥76.50 mg/d of daily cholesterol during the period of one year prior to, or 46.75-76.50 mg/d during the second trimester of pregnancy, the risks of GDM (OR=4.644, 95%CI: 1.106-19.499) would increase. Women with daily cholesterol intake over 76.50 mg/d during the period of one year prior to or at the second trimester of pregnancy, there appeared a risk on GDM (OR=1.217, 95%CI: 1.012-1.463). When maternal age was divided in two different subgroups and the cholesterol intake level was ≥76.50 mg/d both in the period of one year prior to pregnancy or at the second trimester, the risk of GDM appeared in the subgroup ofOR=1.336, 95%CI:1.083-1.647; OR=1.341, 95%CI: 1.087-1.654). However, no significant association was found in the maternal age group of ≥35 years old. Conclusion: High level of dietary cholesterol intake would increase the risk of GDM, both in the period of one year prior to and at the second trimester of pregnancy.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.