Study2018Open access

Photobiomodulation and different macrophages phenotypes during muscle tissue repair

Souza NHC, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Rodrigues MFSD, da Silva DFT, Ribeiro BG, Alves AN, Garcia MP, Nunes FD, da Silva Junior EM, França CM, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KPS

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 53 citations

Review labels

Mechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Animal study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
Animals
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grants
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (13/07502-1)

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2018-07-19 · J Cell Mol Med · vol. 22 · issue 10 · pp. 4922–4934
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
83 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
39 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Medical and Biological Ozone Research
Keywords
Phenotype, Tissue repair, Muscle tissue, Cell biology, Biology, Pathology, Medicine, Anatomy, Genetics, Gene
MeSH
muscles, muscle, skeletal, macrophages, animals, humans, rats, receptors, cell surface, antigens, cd, antigens, differentiation, myelomonocytic, regeneration, wound healing, cell differentiation, muscle development, low-level light therapy, cd163 antigen

12 authors

From BR

  • Nadhia Helena Costa SouzaUniversidade Nove de Julho
  • Raquel Agnelli Mesquita‐FerrariUniversidade Nove de Julho
  • Maria Fernanda Setúbal Destro RodriguesUniversidade Nove de Julho
  • Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da SilvaUniversidade Nove de Julho
  • Beatriz Guimarães RibeiroUniversidade Nove de Julho
  • Agnelo Neves AlvesUniversidade Nove de Julho

Abstract

Macrophages play a very important role in the conduction of several regenerative processes mainly due to their plasticity and multiple functions. In the muscle repair process, while M1 macrophages regulate the inflammatory and proliferative phases, M2 (anti-inflammatory) macrophages direct the differentiation and remodelling phases, leading to tissue regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of red and near infrared (NIR) photobiomodulation (PBM) on macrophage phenotypes and correlate these findings with the repair process following acute muscle injury. Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: control; muscle injury; muscle injury + red PBM; and muscle injury + NIR PBM. After 2, 4 and 7 days, the tibialis anterior muscle was processed for analysis. Macrophages phenotypic profile was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with the different stages of the skeletal muscle repair by the qualitative and quantitative morphological analysis as well as by the evaluation of IL-6, TNF-α and TGF-β mRNA expression. Photobiomodulation at both wavelengths was able to decrease the number of CD68+ (M1) macrophages 2 days after muscle injury and increase the number of CD163+ (M2) macrophages 7 days after injury. However, only NIR treatment was able to increase the number of CD206+ M2 macrophages (Day 2) and TGF-β mRNA expression (Day 2, 4 and 7), favouring the repair process more expressivelly. Treatment with PBM was able to modulate the inflammation phase, optimize the transition from the inflammatory to the regeneration phase (mainly with NIR light) and improve the final step of regeneration, enhancing tissue repair.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.