Randomized controlled trial2018

Caffeine Accelerates Emergence from Isoflurane Anesthesia in Humans: A Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Study

Fong R, Wang L, Zacny JP, Khokhar S, Apfelbaum JL, Fox AP, Xie Z

Anesthesiology · 42 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
University of Chicago
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Government
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM116119)

Based on 4 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-07-25 · Anesthesiology · vol. 129 · issue 5 · pp. 912–920
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
45 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 4.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
35 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents · Coffee research and impacts · Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
Medicine, Isoflurane, Anesthesia, Caffeine, Bispectral index, Placebo, Crossover study, Saline, Adverse effect, Sedation, Pharmacology, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, citrates, isoflurane, caffeine, anesthetics, inhalation, central nervous system stimulants, anesthesia recovery period, cross-over studies, double-blind method, time factors, adult, male

7 authors

From US, CN

  • Robert FongUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University
  • Lingzhi WangUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University
  • James P. ZacnyUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University
  • Suhail KhokharUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University
  • Jeffrey L. ApfelbaumUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University
  • Aaron P.D. FoxUniversity of Illinois Chicago; University of Chicago; Guangzhou Medical University

Abstract

What we already know about this topic

WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: There are currently no drugs clinically available to reverse general anesthesia. We previously reported that caffeine is able to accelerate emergence from anesthesia in rodents. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that caffeine accelerates emergence from anesthesia in humans.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind crossover study with eight healthy males. Each subject was anesthetized twice with 1.2% isoflurane for 1 h. During the final 10 min of each session, participants received an IV infusion of either caffeine citrate (15 mg/kg, equivalent to 7.5 mg/kg of caffeine base) or saline placebo. The primary outcome was the average difference in time to emergence after isoflurane discontinuation between caffeine and saline sessions. Secondary outcomes included the end-tidal isoflurane concentration at emergence, vital signs, and Bispectral Index values measured throughout anesthesia and emergence. Additional endpoints related to data gathered from postanesthesia psychomotor testing.

Results

All randomized participants were included in the analysis. The mean time to emergence with saline was 16.5 ± 3.9 (SD) min compared to 9.6 ± 5.1 (SD) min with caffeine (P = 0.002), a difference of 6.9 min (99% CI, 1.8 to 12), a 42% reduction. Participants emerged at a higher expired isoflurane concentration, manifested more rapid return to baseline Bispectral Index values, and were able to participate in psychomotor testing sooner when receiving caffeine. There were no statistically significant differences in vital signs with caffeine administration and caffeine-related adverse events.

Conclusions

Intravenous caffeine is able to accelerate emergence from isoflurane anesthesia in healthy males without any apparent adverse effects.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.