Association between red and processed meat intake and colorectal adenoma incidence and recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhao Z, Yin Z, Hang Z, Zhang C, Zhao Q
Oncotarget · 10 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2017-12-21 · Oncotarget · vol. 9 · issue 64 · pp. 32373–32382
- Publisher
- Impact Journals LLC
- Cited
- 13 citations · more than 25% of similar papers · 0.1× the field average
- References
- 53 works
- Access
- Open access (free to publish) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Incidence (geometry), Medicine, Colorectal adenoma, Meta-analysis, Red meat, Confidence interval, Subgroup analysis, Internal medicine, Traditional medicine, Family medicine, Colorectal cancer, Pathology, Cancer
5 authors
From CN
- Zhanwei Zhao · correspondingPLA Navy General Hospital; Xijing Hospital; Air Force Medical University
- Zifang YinNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital
- Zhenning HangXijing Hospital; Air Force Medical University
- Chaojun ZhangPLA Navy General Hospital
- Qingchuan ZhaoXijing Hospital; Air Force Medical University
Abstract
The associations between red and processed meat intake and colorectal adenoma (CRA) incidence and recurrence are inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analysis these associations. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science up to December 2016. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed. Subgroup analyses, dose-response-analyses, subtype analyses and analyses of CRA locations were also conducted. Twenty-seven studies that involved 208,117 participants and 19,150 cases met criteria. The RRs of the highest versus lowest intakes for CRA incidence were 1.23 (1.15-1.31) for red meat and 1.15 (1.07-1.24) for processed meat. Dose-response analyses for meat per 100 g/day yielded the results were consistent with the original analyses, with 1.14 (1.07-1.20) for red meat and 1.27 (1.03-1.50) for processed meat. Additionally, there were no associations between red and processed meat intake and CRA recurrence, including total CRA (P > 0.05), advanced CRA (P > 0.05) and multiple CRA (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that red and processed meat intake was associated with an increased CRA incidence but not for CRA recurrence.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.