Meta-analysis2018Open access

Association between whole grain intake and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Xiao Y, Ke Y, Wu S, Huang S, Li S, Lv Z, Yeoh EK, Lao X, Wong S, Kim JH, Colditz GA, Tamimi RM, Su X

Nutrition journal · 33 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Government
Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81402672)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2018-09-21 · Nutr J · vol. 17 · issue 1 · p. 87
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
51 citations · more than 66% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
77 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Celiac Disease Research and Management · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Breast cancer, Relative risk, Subgroup analysis, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Observational study, Cohort study, Publication bias, Cochrane Library, Epidemiology, Cancer, Oncology
MeSH
humans, breast neoplasms, diet, risk factors, adult, aged, middle aged, female, observational studies as topic, whole grains

13 authors

From CN, HK, US

  • Yunjun XiaoShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Yuebin KeShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Shuang WuShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Suli HuangShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Siguo LiShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Ziquan LvShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies have found that high whole grain intake may be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, the evidence has not been consistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the association between whole grain intake and breast cancer risk.

Methods

Relevant observational studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library databases, and Google Scholar through April 2017. Summary relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 11 studies, including 4 cohort and 7 case-control studies and involving 131,151 participants and 11,589 breast cancer cases, were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled RR of breast cancer for those with high versus low whole grain intake was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 0.96, p = 0.009; I2 = 63.8%, p for heterogeneity = 0.002). Subgroup analysis by study design found a significant inverse association in the case-control studies (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.87, p = 0.001; I2 = 58.2%, p for heterogeneity = 0.026), but not in the cohort studies (RR, 0.96; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.14, p = 0.69; I2 = 66.7%, p for heterogeneity = 0.029). In addition, stratified analysis suggested that sample size could be a potential source of heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Results of the current meta-analysis suggest that high intake of whole grains might be inversely associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, and the inverse association was only observed in case-control but not cohort studies. More large-scale cohort studies are needed to confirm the inverse association observed.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.