Cohort study2019Industry funded

Funded in part by American Egg Board/Egg Nutrition Center

Egg Intake Has No Adverse Association With Blood Lipids Or Glucose In Adolescent Girls

Mott MM, McCrory MA, Bandini LG, Cabral HJ, Daniels SR, Singer MR, Moore LL

Journal of the American College of Nutrition · 2 citations

Review labels

Industry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Government
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Government
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Industry group
American Egg Board/Egg Nutrition Center
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21 DK075068)

Based on 5 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-10-03 · J Am Coll Nutr · vol. 38 · issue 2 · pp. 119–124
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
5 citations · more than 63% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
References
29 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
Blood lipids, Medicine, Adverse effect, Food science, Physiology, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Biology, Cholesterol
MeSH
humans, insulin resistance, blood glucose, lipids, diet, longitudinal studies, eating, eggs, adolescent, child, female

7 authors

From US

  • Melanie M. MottBoston University
  • Megan A. McCroryBoston University
  • Linda G. BandiniBoston University; University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School; Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
  • Howard CabralBoston University
  • Stephen R. DanielsChildren's Hospital Colorado; University of Colorado Denver
  • Martha R. SingerBoston University

Abstract

Objective

Longitudinal data on cardiometabolic effects of egg intake during adolescence are lacking. The current analyses aim to evaluate the impact of usual adolescent egg consumption on lipid levels, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance during late adolescence (age 17-20 years).

Methods

Data from 1392 girls, aged 9 to 10 at baseline and followed for 10 years, in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's National Growth and Health Study were used to examine the association between usual egg intake alone and in combination with other healthy lifestyle factors and late adolescent lipid levels, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance, measured as homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Diet was assessed using 3-day food records during eight examination cycles. Girls were classified according to usual weekly egg intake, ages 9-17 years: <1 egg/wk (n = 361), 1 to <3 eggs/wk (n = 703), and ≥3 eggs/wk (n = 328). Analysis of covariance modeling was used to control for confounding by other behavioral and biological risk factors.

Results

Girls with low, moderate, and high egg intakes had adjusted low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 99.7, 98.8, and 95.5 mg/dL, respectively (p = 0.0778). In combination with higher intakes of fiber, dairy, or fruits and vegetables, these beneficial effects were stronger and statistically significant. There was no evidence that ≥3 eggs/wk had an adverse effect on lipids, glucose, or HOMA-IR. More active girls who consumed ≥3 eggs/wk had the lowest levels of insulin resistance.

Conclusion

These results suggest that eggs may be included as part of a healthy adolescent diet without adverse effects on glucose, lipid levels, or insulin resistance.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.