Randomized controlled trial2019

Recovery following Rugby Union matches: effects of cold water immersion on markers of fatigue and damage

Nunes RFH, Duffield R, Nakamura FY, Bezerra ES, Sakugawa RL, Loturco I, Bobinski F, Martins DF, Guglielmo LGA

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 17 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-10-15 · Appl Physiol Nutr Metab · vol. 44 · issue 5 · pp. 546–556
Publisher
NRC Research Press
Cited
22 citations · more than 70% of similar papers · 0.8× the field average
References
40 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Sports Performance and Training · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
Immersion (mathematics), Forensic engineering, Materials science, Psychology, Engineering, Mathematics
MeSH
humans, inflammation, immersion, muscle fatigue, football, adult, male, athletic performance, cold temperature, young adult, athletes, biomarkers

9 authors

From BR, AU, IT

  • Renan Felipe Hartmann NunesUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Rob DuffieldUniversity of Technology Sydney
  • Fábio Yuzo NakamuraUniversity of Chieti-Pescara
  • Ewertton de Souza BezerraUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Universidade Federal do Amazonas
  • Raphael Luiz SakugawaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Irineu Loturco

Abstract

We investigated the effect of postmatch cold-water immersion (CWI) on markers of muscle damage, neuromuscular fatigue, and perceptual responses within 72 h after a rugby match. Twenty-two professional male rugby players were randomized into CWI (10 °C/10 min; n = 11) or control (CON: 30 min seated; n = 11) groups. Activity profile from Global Positioning Satellite systems and postmatch rating of perceived exertion were measured to determined match load. Biochemical (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6), neuromuscular performance (squat (SJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ), peak power output (PPO), rate of force development (RFD), stiffness, 10- and 30-m sprint time, and perceptual markers (soreness, perceived recovery) were obtained before and immediately after the match, and then at 30 min, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after the match. Magnitude-based inference and Cohen's effect size (ES) were used to analyze change over time and between groups. Thus, the higher/beneficial, similar/trivial, or lower/harmful differences were evaluated as follows: almost certainly not; 1% to 5%, very unlikely; 5% to 25%, unlikely; 25% to 75%, possible; 75% to 95%, likely; 95% to 99%, very likely; >99%, almost certainly. Changes were unclear for the match loads, sprint times, and perceptual markers between groups. Higher %ΔSJ at 24 h (very likely (ES = 0.75)) and in %ΔPPO_SJ at 48 h (likely (ES = 0.51)) were observed in CWI than in CON. Values in %ΔRDF_CMJ were higher immediately after (likely (ES = 0.83)), 30 min after (very likely (ES = 0.97)), and 24 h after the match (likely (ES = 0.93)) in CWI than in CON. Furthermore, %Δlog TNF-α were lower in the CWI group than in the CON group immediately after (almost certainly (ES = -0.76)), 24 h after (very likely (ES = -1.09)), and 72 h after the match (likely (ES = -0.51)), and in Δstiffness_SJ at 30 min after (likely (ES = -0.67)) and 48 h after the match (very likely (ES = -0.97)). Also, different within-groups effects throughout postmatch were reported. Implementing postmatch CWI-based strategies improved the recovery of markers of inflammation and fatigue in rugby players, despite no change in markers of speed or perceptual recovery.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.