Effects of Canola Oil Consumption on Lipid Profile: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
Ghobadi S, Hassanzadeh-Rostami Z, Mohammadian F, Zare M, Faghih S
Journal of the American College of Nutrition · 35 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2018-10-31 · J Am Coll Nutr · vol. 38 · issue 2 · pp. 185–196
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Cited
- 54 citations · more than 63% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
- References
- 51 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Fatty Acid Research and Health · Diet and metabolism studies · Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- Randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis, Canola, Medicine, Lipid profile, Internal medicine, Food science, Cholesterol, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, cholesterol, lipids, dietary fats, triglycerides, apolipoprotein a-i, diet, eating, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, cholesterol, ldl, cholesterol, hdl, young adult, rapeseed oil
5 authors
From IR
- Saeed GhobadiShiraz University of Medical Sciences; Saveh University of Medical Sciences
- Zahra Hassanzadeh-RostamiShiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Fatemeh MohammadianShiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Morteza ZareKerman University of Medical Sciences
- Shiva Faghih · correspondingShiraz University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Hyperlipidemia is a well- known risk factor of cardiovascular disease. A healthy diet containing vegetable oils such as canola oil (CO) may help to reduce serum lipids. This study aimed to quantify the effects of CO on lipid parameters using a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and Embase were systematically searched until December 2017, with no time and design restrictions. Also, a manual search was performed to find extra relevant articles. Lipid parameters including total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), and apolipoprotein B (Apo B) were entered the meta-analysis. Weighed mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were stated as the effect size. Sensitivity analyses and prespecified subgroup were conducted to evaluate potential heterogeneity. Twenty-seven trials, comprising 1359 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Results of this study showed that CO consumption significantly reduced TC (-7.24 mg/dl, 95% CI, -12.1 to -2.7), and LDL (-6.4 mg/dl, 95% CI, -10.8 to -2), although it had no effects on HDL, TG, Apo B, and Apo A1. Effects of CO on TC and LDL significantly decreased after CO consumption in subgroups of >50 years of age participants and >30 intervention duration subgroup. Moreover, CO decreased LDL and TC compared to sunflower oil and saturated fat. This meta-analysis suggested that CO consumption improves serum TC and LDL, which could postpone heart disease progression. Key Teaching Points CO consumption could decrease serum TC and LDL, although it had no effects on other blood lipids. There was an overall significant effect of canola oil on TC and LDL compared to sunflower oil and saturated fats. CO could have beneficial effects on serum TC and LDL just when consumed longer than 30 days. CO consumption improved lipid profiles in participants older than 50 years.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.