Funded in part by National Dairy Council, American Egg Board-Egg Nutrition Center, US Dairy Export Council, American Egg Board, Leprino Foods, Barilla International, North Dakota Beef Commission, Beef Checkoff and the Pork Checkoff, Johnson's Baby and the Center for Child
Adopting a Mediterranean-Style Eating Pattern with Different Amounts of Lean Unprocessed Red Meat Does Not Influence Short-Term Subjective Personal Well-Being in Adults with Overweight or Obesity
O'Connor LE, Biberstine SL, Paddon-Jones D, Schwichtenberg AJ, Campbell WW
The Journal of nutrition · 15 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Food provided by researchers
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Industry funded
- University or hospital
- Purdue University
- University or hospital
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
- University or hospital
- Purdue Research Foundation
- Government
- National Institutes of Health
- Government
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Government
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- Government
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Government
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Industry group
- National Dairy Council
- Government
- National Institutes of Health's Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
- Government
- NCATS NIH HHS
- Industry group
- American Egg Board-Egg Nutrition Center
- Industry group
- US Dairy Export Council
- Government
- National Institues of Health pre-doctoral
- Industry group
- American Egg Board, Leprino Foods
- Company
- Barilla International
- Nonprofit
- Kinley Trust
- Government
- NIH
- Nonprofit
- Gadomski Foundation
- Industry group
- North Dakota Beef Commission
- University or hospital
- Ingestive Behavior Research Center at Purdue University
- Government
- NIDDK NIH HHS
- Industry group
- Beef Checkoff and the Pork Checkoff
- Unclassified
- Family Well-being
- Company
- Johnson's Baby and the Center for Child
- Grants
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32 DK076540); Purdue University (UL1TR001108); National Institute of Mental Health (UL1TR001108); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR-001108); National Institutes of Health (UL-1-TR001108)
Based on 25 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2018-08-23 · J Nutr · vol. 148 · issue 12 · pp. 1917–1923
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Cited
- 17 citations · more than 76% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
- References
- 43 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
- Research areas
- Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Keywords
- Overweight, Mood, Body mass index, Red meat, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Medicine, Obesity, Actigraphy, Crossover study, Demography, Sleep quality, Placebo, Insomnia, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
- MeSH
- humans, obesity, cross-over studies, feeding behavior, affect, sleep, diet, mediterranean, quality of life, adult, middle aged, female, male, overweight, red meat
5 authors
From US
- Lauren E O’Connor
- Sarah L Biberstine
- Douglas J. Paddon-JonesPurdue University West Lafayette; The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
- A. J. SchwichtenbergPurdue University West Lafayette; The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
- Wayne W. Campbell · corresponding
Abstract
Background
Reducing red meat intake is commonly recommended. Limited observational studies suggest that healthy eating patterns with red meat are associated with improved quality of life.
Objective
The secondary objectives of this randomized crossover controlled-feeding trial were to assess the effects of following a Mediterranean-style eating pattern (Med-Pattern) with different amounts of red meat on indexes of personal well-being (i.e., perceived quality of life, mood, and sleep) in overweight or obese adults. We hypothesized that following a Med-Pattern would improve these outcomes, independent of red meat intake amount.
Methods
Forty-one participants [aged 46 ± 2 y; body mass index (kg/m2): 30.5 ± 0.6; n = 28 women, n = 13 men) were provided Med-Pattern foods for two 5-wk periods separated by 4 wk of self-selected eating. The Med-Red Pattern contained ∼500 g/wk (typical US intake), and the Med-Control Pattern contained ∼200 g/wk (commonly recommended intake in heart-healthy eating patterns) of lean, unprocessed beef or pork compensated with mainly poultry and dairy. Baseline and postintervention outcomes measured were perceived quality of life via the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2), daily mood states via the Profile of Mood States (POMS), sleep perceptions via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and sleep patterns via actigraphy. Data were analyzed via a doubly repeated-measures ANOVA adjusted for age, sex, and body mass at each time point.
Results
Following a Med-Pattern did not change domains of physical health, mental health, total mood disturbances, sleep perceptions, and sleep patterns but improved subdomains of physical health role limitations (SF-36v2: 93.6-96.7%; P = 0.038), vitality (SF-36v2: 57.9-63.0%; P = 0.020), and fatigue (POMS: 2.9-2.5 arbitrary units; P = 0.039). There were no differences between the Med-Red and Med-Control Patterns (time × pattern, P-interaction > 0.05).
Conclusion
Following a Med-Pattern, independent of lean, unprocessed red meat intake, may not be an effective short-term strategy to meaningfully improve indexes of personal well-being in adults who are overweight or obese. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02573129.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.