Randomized controlled trial2018

Fish Oil and Perioperative Bleeding

Akintoye E, Sethi P, Harris WS, Thompson PA, Marchioli R, Tavazzi L, Latini R, Pretorius M, Brown NJ, Libby P, Mozaffarian D

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 47 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Government
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grants
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RC2-HL101816)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-11-01 · Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes · vol. 11 · issue 11 · p. e004584
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
73 citations · more than 93% of similar papers · 3.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
52 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Renal function and acid-base balance
Keywords
Medicine, Fish oil, Perioperative, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Surgery, Fishery
MeSH
humans, postoperative hemorrhage, fish oils, coronary artery bypass, odds ratio, risk, double-blind method, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female, male

11 authors

From US, GB, IT

  • Emmanuel O. AkintoyeUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
  • Prince SethiUniversity of South Dakota
  • William Stephen HarrisUniversity of South Dakota
  • Paul Andrew ThompsonUniversity of South Dakota
  • Roberto MarchioliIQVIA (United Kingdom)
  • Luigi TavazziMaria Cecilia Hospital

Abstract

Background Fish oil is among the most common natural supplements for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia or prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, concerns about theoretical bleeding risk have led to recommendations that patients should stop taking fish oil before surgery or delay in elective procedures for patients taking fish oil by some health care professionals. Methods and Results We tested the effect of fish oil supplementation on perioperative bleeding in a multinational, placebo-controlled trial involving 1516 patients who were randomized to perioperative fish oil (eicosapentaenoic acid+docosahexaenoic acid; 8-10 g for 2-5 days preoperatively, and then 2 g/d postoperatively) or placebo. Primary outcome was major perioperative bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Secondary outcomes include perioperative bleeding per thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definitions, chest tube output, and total units of blood transfused. Participants' mean (SD) age was 63 (13) years, and planned surgery included coronary artery bypass graft (52%) and valve surgery (50%). The primary outcome occurred in 92 patients (6.1%). Compared with placebo, risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding was not higher in the fish oil group: odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.53-1.24; absolute risk difference, 1.1% lower (95% CI, -3.0% to 1.8%). Similar findings were seen for secondary bleeding definitions. The total units of blood transfused were significantly lower in the fish oil group compared with placebo (mean, 1.61 versus 1.92; P<0.001). Evaluating achieved plasma phospholipid omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids levels with supplementation (on the morning of surgery), higher levels were associated with lower risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding, with substantially lower risk in the third (odds ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.11-0.78]) and fourth (0.36 [95% CI, 0.15-0.87]) quartiles, compared with the lowest quartile. Conclusions Fish oil supplementation did not increase perioperative bleeding and reduced the number of blood transfusions. Higher achieved n-3-PUFA levels were associated with lower risk of bleeding. These novel findings support the need for reconsideration of current recommendations to stop fish oil or delay procedures before cardiac surgery. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00970489.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.