Study2018

Post-exercise cold-water immersion improves the performance in a subsequent 5-km running trial

De Paula F, Escobar K, Ottone V, Aguiar P, Aguiar de Matos M, Duarte T, Araújo T, Costa K, Magalhães F, Rocha-Vieira E, Amorim F

Temperature (Austin, Tex.) · 7 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Government
CNPq
Government
CAPES
Government
FAPEMIG
Grants
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (2014-4); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (445096/2014-4); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (PNPD-2455/2011); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (CDS-APQ 00908-08); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2014-4)

Based on 6 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2018-07-03 · Temperature (Austin) · vol. 5 · issue 4 · pp. 359–370
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
11 citations · more than 68% of similar papers · 0.5× the field average
References
48 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Medicine, Crossover study, Heart rate, Rectal temperature, Eccentric exercise, Physical therapy, Immersion (mathematics), Treadmill, Time trial, VO2 max, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Muscle damage, Blood pressure, Mathematics

11 authors

From BR, US

  • Fabrício de PaulaUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
  • Kurt A. EscobarCalifornia State University, Long Beach
  • Vinícius de Oliveira OttoneUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
  • Paula Fernandes de AguiarUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
  • Mariana Aguiar de MatosUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
  • Tamiris Campos DuarteUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri

Abstract

Various post-exercise strategies have been proposed to accelerate recovery during periods of training. However, the effects of water immersion (WI) temperature on recovery amid multiple daily exercise bouts are not well investigated.

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of cold and warm water immersion temperatures between acute exercise bouts vs. no WI recovery on running performance.

Methods

Nine recreationally trained men (age: 24.0 ± 6.0 years old) participated in four experimental sessions using a crossover design. Each experimental session consisted of unilateral eccentric knee flexion exercise and 90 min of treadmill running at 70% of peak oxygen consumption followed by 15 min of WI at 15°C, 28°C or 38°C or passive recovery seated at room temperature (CON). Four hours following WI or CON, subjects completed a 5 km running time trial. Rectal temperature (Trec), heart rate, and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) were measured.

Results

Statistical analyses indicated that time trial performance was not affected by post-exercise recovery by WI (P > .05). The magnitude-based inferences indicated that 15°C (+ 3.6 ± 7.8%) likely and 28°C (+ 3.2 ± 7.5%) possibly improved recovery compared with CON, while the effect of 38°C (- 0.1 ± 12.3%) on recovery was unclear. During WI, heart rate and rectal temperature were not different from CON, but EPOC was higher in 15°C and 28°C compared to CON. Trec in 15°C was lower than CON from the 15th min post WI. EPOC was also greater in 15°C post WI compared to CON.

Conclusion

WI at 15°C and 28°C following acute exercise likely and possibly, respectively, improved subsequent 5 km running time trial performance. We speculate that the faster recovery in core temperature post-exercise may underlie these improvements in recovery.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.