Study2018Open access

Photobiomodulation by Led Does Not Alter Muscle Recovery Indicators and Presents Similar Outcomes to Cold-Water Immersion and Active Recovery

Malta ES, de Lira FS, Machado FA, Zago AS, do Amaral SL, Zagatto AM

Frontiers in physiology · 19 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grants
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/05012-2)

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2019-01-14 · Front Physiol · vol. 9 · p. 1948
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Cited
29 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 3.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
36 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Medical and Biological Ozone Research
Keywords
Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

6 authors

From BR

  • Elvis de Souza MaltaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Fábio Santos LiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Fabiana Andrade MachadoUniversidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Anderson Saranz ZagoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Sandra L. AmaralUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Alessandro Moura Zagatto · correspondingUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on muscle recovery based on inflammation (interleukin-10 [IL-10]; tumor necrosis factor-α [TNFα]), muscle damage markers (creatine kinase [CK]; lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), delay onset muscle soreness (DOMS), and countermovement jump performance (CMJ) after two sprint interval training (SIT) sessions compared with a placebo condition (part-I), as well as to compare the effectiveness of PBMT with active recovery (AR) and cold-water immersion (CWI) (part-II). Methods: Part-I was conducted as a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study and part-II as a parallel-group study. Thirty-six men participated in the studies (12 participants in part-I and 36 participants in part-II). Volunteers performed two SITs interspaced by 24-h (SIT1 and SIT2) to mimic the effect of accumulating 2 consecutive days of SIT. In part-I, only after SIT2, PBMT [Total energy: 600J (300J per leg in 5 spots); wavelength: 660-850 nm] or placebo interventions were performed, while in part-II PBMT (part-I data), AR (15-min; 50% of the maximal aerobic power), or CWI (10-min; 10°C) were carried out, also after SIT2. Blood samples were collected before (i.e., baseline), and 0.5, 1, 24, 48, and 72-h after SIT2, while CMJ and DOMS were measured before, 24, 48, and 72-h after SIT2. Results: In part-I, there were no interactions between PBMT and placebo conditions for any blood markers (P ≥ 0.313), DOMS (P = 0.052), and CMJ (P = 0.295). However, an effect of time was found with increases in LDH, CK, and IL-10 (P ≤ 0.043) as well as a decrease in DOMS at 72-h compared with 24-h (P = 0.012). In part-II, there were no interactions between the PBMT, AR, and CWI groups for any markers at the same moments (P ≥ 0.189) and for the peak and integral values (P ≥ 0.193), for DOMS (P = 0.314) and CMJ (P = 0.264). However, an effect of time was found with an increase in CK and IL-10 (P = 0.003), while DOMS decreased at 48 and 72-h compared with 24-h (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In summary, PBMT had no effect on inflammation, muscle damage, CMJ performance, or DOMS after two consecutive sprint interval training sessions compared to placebo, CWI, and AR strategies.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.