Caffeine Supplementation and Physical Performance, Muscle Damage and Perception of Fatigue in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review
Mielgo-Ayuso J, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Del Coso J, Urdampilleta A, León-Guereño P, Fernández-Lázaro D
Nutrients · 57 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2019-02-20 · Nutrients · vol. 11 · issue 2 · p. 440
- Publisher
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Cited
- 91 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
- References
- 63 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Coffee research and impacts · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- Caffeine, Sprint, Medicine, Placebo, Physical therapy, Pill, Muscle damage, Muscle fatigue, Jumping, Physical fitness, MEDLINE, Team sport, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Psychology, Athletes, Alternative medicine, Physiology, Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Electromyography
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, fatigue, caffeine, cross-over studies, perception, running, soccer, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic, athletic performance, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, physical functional performance
6 authors
From ES
- Juan Mielgo‐Ayuso · correspondingUniversidad de Valladolid
- Julio Calleja-GonzálezUniversity of the Basque Country
- Juan Del CosoCamilo José Cela University
- Aritz Urdampilleta
- Patxi León-GuereñoUniversidad de Deusto
- Diego Fernández‐LázaroUniversidad de Valladolid
Abstract
Soccer is a complex team sport and success in this discipline depends on different factors such as physical fitness, player technique and team tactics, among others. In the last few years, several studies have described the impact of caffeine intake on soccer physical performance, but the results of these investigations have not been properly reviewed and summarized. The main objective of this review was to evaluate critically the effectiveness of a moderate dose of caffeine on soccer physical performance. A structured search was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2007 to November 2018. The search included studies with a cross-over and randomized experimental design in which the intake of caffeine (either from caffeinated drinks or pills) was compared to an identical placebo situation. There were no filters applied to the soccer players' level, gender or age. This review included 17 articles that investigated the effects of caffeine on soccer-specific abilities (n = 12) or on muscle damage (n = 5). The review concluded that 5 investigations (100% of the number of investigations on this topic) had found ergogenic effects of caffeine on jump performance, 4 (100%) on repeated sprint ability and 2 (100%) on running distance during a simulated soccer game. However, only 1 investigation (25%) found as an effect of caffeine to increase serum markers of muscle damage, while no investigation reported an effect of caffeine to reduce perceived fatigue after soccer practice. In conclusion, a single and moderate dose of caffeine, ingested 5⁻60 min before a soccer practice, might produce valuable improvements in certain abilities related to enhanced soccer physical performance. However, caffeine does not seem to cause increased markers of muscle damage or changes in perceived exertion during soccer practice.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.