Systematic review2019Open access

Caffeine Supplementation and Physical Performance, Muscle Damage and Perception of Fatigue in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review

Mielgo-Ayuso J, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Del Coso J, Urdampilleta A, León-Guereño P, Fernández-Lázaro D

Nutrients · 57 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-02-20 · Nutrients · vol. 11 · issue 2 · p. 440
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
91 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
References
63 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Coffee research and impacts · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Caffeine, Sprint, Medicine, Placebo, Physical therapy, Pill, Muscle damage, Muscle fatigue, Jumping, Physical fitness, MEDLINE, Team sport, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Psychology, Athletes, Alternative medicine, Physiology, Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Electromyography
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, fatigue, caffeine, cross-over studies, perception, running, soccer, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic, athletic performance, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, physical functional performance

6 authors

From ES

  • Juan Mielgo‐Ayuso · correspondingUniversidad de Valladolid
  • Julio Calleja-GonzálezUniversity of the Basque Country
  • Juan Del CosoCamilo José Cela University
  • Aritz Urdampilleta
  • Patxi León-GuereñoUniversidad de Deusto
  • Diego Fernández‐LázaroUniversidad de Valladolid

Abstract

Soccer is a complex team sport and success in this discipline depends on different factors such as physical fitness, player technique and team tactics, among others. In the last few years, several studies have described the impact of caffeine intake on soccer physical performance, but the results of these investigations have not been properly reviewed and summarized. The main objective of this review was to evaluate critically the effectiveness of a moderate dose of caffeine on soccer physical performance. A structured search was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2007 to November 2018. The search included studies with a cross-over and randomized experimental design in which the intake of caffeine (either from caffeinated drinks or pills) was compared to an identical placebo situation. There were no filters applied to the soccer players' level, gender or age. This review included 17 articles that investigated the effects of caffeine on soccer-specific abilities (n = 12) or on muscle damage (n = 5). The review concluded that 5 investigations (100% of the number of investigations on this topic) had found ergogenic effects of caffeine on jump performance, 4 (100%) on repeated sprint ability and 2 (100%) on running distance during a simulated soccer game. However, only 1 investigation (25%) found as an effect of caffeine to increase serum markers of muscle damage, while no investigation reported an effect of caffeine to reduce perceived fatigue after soccer practice. In conclusion, a single and moderate dose of caffeine, ingested 5⁻60 min before a soccer practice, might produce valuable improvements in certain abilities related to enhanced soccer physical performance. However, caffeine does not seem to cause increased markers of muscle damage or changes in perceived exertion during soccer practice.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.