[Study on the application of oral magnesium sulfate solution in split doses as bowel preparation for colonoscopy in elderly patients]
Ge FL, Su BB, Li TT, Shi LL, Lyu Y, Wan J
Zhonghua nei ke za zhi · 0 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Chinese PLA Special Scientific Research Projects of Health Care
Based on 1 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2019-03-01 · Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi · vol. 58 · issue 3 · pp. 181–184
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Cited
- 1 citation · more than 51% of similar papers · 0.1× the field average
- References
- 0 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Diverticular Disease and Complications · Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Keywords
- Medicine, Colonoscopy, Nausea, Vomiting, Defecation, Gastroenterology, Abdominal distension, Internal medicine, Group B, Enema, Adverse effect, Bowel preparation, Magnesium, Flatulence, Colorectal cancer
- MeSH
- humans, nausea, vomiting, magnesium sulfate, cathartics, colonoscopy, preoperative care, defecation, aged
6 authors
From CN
- Feifan GeChinese PLA General Hospital
- Bo Su
- T T Li
- L L Shi
- Ying Lyu
- Joy Y. Wan
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral magnesium sulfate solution in split doses as bowel preparation in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 368 elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled at PLA General Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into magnesium sulfate solution orally in split doses group (group A, n=178) and single dose group (group B, n=190). Parameters including general information, defecation frequency, Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS), detection rate of lesions and adverse reactions. Results: The frequency of defecations in group A was (7.6±1.4), more than that in group B (6.6±1.5) with statistical significance (P0.05). The duration of bowel preparation in group A was (128.6±25.3) min, shorter than that of group B (165.4±29.7) min (P0.05). The BBPS in group A was (8.09±0.67), better than that of group B (7.34±0.58) (P0.05). The detection rates of intestinal polyps and micropolyps (diameter0.5 cm) in group A were 73/178 (41.0%) and 51/178 (28.7%) respectively, compared with 58/190 (30.5%) and 37/190 (19.5%) in group B (both P0.05). In group A, 8 patients reported adverse reactions as abdominal distension and discomfort. One patient had ST-T abnormality of electrocardiogram (ECG). No nausea or vomiting occurred, yet 2 cases needed enema for inadequate bowel preparation. Twenty-one cases in group B reported adverse events including 7 with nausea and vomiting. There were 13 patients treated with enema. Abnormal ECG was found in 4 patients in group B. The satisfaction rate of group A was 97.8%, higher than that of group B (91.6%) (P0.05). Conclusions: The effect of bowel preparation of elderly patients with magnesium sulfate solution in split dose has a better tolerance, good cleaning effect and low incidence of adverse reactions. It is an ideal choice for the elderly to prepare colonoscopy.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.