Randomized controlled trial2019

A New Mathematical Approach to Explore the Post-exercise Recovery Process and Its Applicability in a Cold Water Immersion Protocol

Micheletti JK, Vanderlei FM, Machado AF, de Almeida AC, Nakamura FY, Netto Junior J, Pastre CM

Journal of strength and conditioning research · 9 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-03-20 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 33 · issue 5 · pp. 1266–1275
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
18 citations · more than 76% of similar papers · 1.3× the field average
References
68 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Sports Performance and Training · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
Sprint, Confidence interval, Isometric exercise, Heart rate variability, Mathematics, Heart rate, Physical therapy, Medicine, Statistics, Internal medicine, Blood pressure
MeSH
humans, lactic acid, exercise, immersion, heart rate, isometric contraction, models, theoretical, soccer, adolescent, male, athletic performance, cold temperature

7 authors

From BR, AU

  • Jéssica Kirsch Micheletti · correspondingUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Franciele Marques VanderleiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Aryane Flauzino MachadoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Aline Castilho de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos
  • Fábio Yuzo NakamuraJames Cook University
  • Jayme NettoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Abstract

Micheletti, JK, Vanderlei, FM, Machado, AF, de Almeida, AC, Nakamura, FY, Netto Junior, J, and Pastre, CM. A new mathematical approach to explore the post-exercise recovery process and its applicability in a cold water immersion protocol. J Strength Cond Res 33(5): 1266-1275, 2019-The objective of this study was to propose a mathematical model to analyze the post-training recovery of perceptive, functional, metabolic, and autonomic parameters from the use of cold water immersion (CWI) through isolated and combined analysis. Following simulated training, 64 male soccer players were randomized into an experimental group (EG: CWI, 13 ± 1° C; 15 minutes) and a control group (CG: passive recovery; 15 minutes). Perceptive (soreness and perception of recovery), autonomic (heart rate variability [HRV]), metabolic (lactate concentration), and functional parameters (squat jump, T agility test, sprint test, 40-second test, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction) were analyzed before and at specific moments after training (without exceeding 2 hours after training). The variables were analyzed using the raw data, dichotomization of each variable (isolated analysis), and through a mathematical model using the combination of all parameters analyzed (combined analysis). The combined analysis did not demonstrate better efficacy of the EG compared with the CG (69.17 and 63.4%, p = 0.09). In the isolated analysis, a chance of the technique being better was observed in the metabolic parameter at 1 and 2 hours after training (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval = 3.75 [1.01-13.88] and 11.11 [1.25-98.49]), respectively, and in the autonomic parameter at 40-45 minutes after training (4.4 [1.09-17.67]). For the raw data, all parameters analyzed presented recovery by 2 hours after training for both groups. Based on the proposed mathematical model, it is concluded that CWI is not better than the control condition. However, considering the analysis of variables in isolation, the technique presents a better chance of recovery for blood lactate concentration and HRV.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.