Meta-analysis2020

Wake up and smell the coffee: caffeine supplementation and exercise performance-an umbrella review of 21 published meta-analyses

Grgic J, Grgic I, Pickering C, Schoenfeld BJ, Bishop DJ, Pedisic Z

British journal of sports medicine · 239 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-03-29 · Br J Sports Med · vol. 54 · issue 11 · pp. 681–688
Publisher
BMJ
Cited
368 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 30.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
64 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Coffee research and impacts · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
Caffeine, Medicine, Anaerobic exercise, Meta-analysis, Physical therapy, Checklist, Aerobic exercise, Systematic review, Jumping, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Quality of evidence, MEDLINE, Physiology, Internal medicine, Psychology
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, caffeine, exercise, sex factors, coffee, dietary supplements, female, male, muscle strength, athletic performance, performance-enhancing substances

6 authors

From AU, DE, GB, US

  • Jozo Grgić · correspondingVictoria University
  • Ivana GrgicGollwitzer-Meier-Klinik
  • Craig PickeringUniversity of Lancashire; Genomics England
  • Brad Jon SchoenfeldLehman College
  • David John BishopEdith Cowan University; Victoria University
  • Željko PedišićVictoria University

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review, summarise and appraise findings of published meta-analyses that examined the effects of caffeine on exercise performance.

Design

Umbrella review.

Data sources

Twelve databases.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Meta-analyses that examined the effects of caffeine ingestion on exercise performance.

Results

Eleven reviews (with a total of 21 meta-analyses) were included, all being of moderate or high methodological quality (assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 checklist). In the meta-analyses, caffeine was ergogenic for aerobic endurance, muscle strength, muscle endurance, power, jumping performance and exercise speed. However, not all analyses provided a definite direction for the effect of caffeine when considering the 95% prediction interval. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria the quality of evidence was generally categorised as moderate (with some low to very low quality of evidence). Most individual studies included in the published meta-analyses were conducted among young men.

Summary/conclusion

Synthesis of the currently available meta-analyses suggest that caffeine ingestion improves exercise performance in a broad range of exercise tasks. Ergogenic effects of caffeine on muscle endurance, muscle strength, anaerobic power and aerobic endurance were substantiated by moderate quality of evidence coming from moderate-to-high quality systematic reviews. For other outcomes, we found moderate quality reviews that presented evidence of very low or low quality. It seems that the magnitude of the effect of caffeine is generally greater for aerobic as compared with anaerobic exercise. More primary studies should be conducted among women, middle-aged and older adults to improve the generalisability of these findings.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.