Study2019Open access

Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers

Webster EK, Martin CK, Staiano AE

Journal of sport and health science · 127 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Possibly industry funded
Government
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Government
NIGMS NIH HHS
Government
NIMHD NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54‐ GM104940); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54 MD008602); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK-072476)

Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2018-11-24 · J Sport Health Sci · vol. 8 · issue 2 · pp. 114–121
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
275 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 21.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
48 works
Access
Open access (free to publish) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Children's Physical and Motor Development · Child Development and Digital Technology · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
basic motor skills, screen time, physical activity, sedentary behavior, preschool children, toddlers, high-intensity exercise, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, manual dexterity, locomotor skills, sex differences, socioeconomic status, daycare centers, accelerometer-measured activity, TGMD-3, MABC-2, childhood obesity prevention, early childhood health promotion

3 authors

From US

  • Elizabeth Kipling WebsterLouisiana State University
  • Corby K. MartinPennington Biomedical Research Center; Louisiana State University
  • Amanda E. Staiano · correspondingPennington Biomedical Research Center; Louisiana State University

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the associations among preschoolers fundamental motor skills, screen-time, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior (SB).

Methods

Children ages 3-4years were enrolled in a prospective observational trial of PA. Trained assessors conducted the Test of Gross Motor Development-3rdedition (TGMD-3), and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2nd edition, and parent-reported child screen-time and sociodemographic information. Children wore an accelerometer for 7days to examine SB and total PA (TPA). TPA was further characterized as moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) or vigorous PA (VPA). Mixed linear models were calculated, controlling for age (for TGMD-3), sex, household income, and accelerometer wear time (for accelerometry models), with childcare center as a random effect. The primary analysis reported on the cross-sectional baseline data of 126 children with complete fundamental motor skill and screen-time data; a subanalysis included 88 children with complete accelerometry data.

Results

Children were 3.4 ± 0.5years of age (54% girls; 46% white, 42% African American, 12% other). A total of 48% lived in households at or below the federal poverty level. Children engaged in 5.1 ± 3.6h/day of screen-time. Children's screen-time was inversely related to the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2nd edition, manual dexterity skills percentile (β (SE) = -1.7 (0.8), p = 0.049). In the accelerometry subsample, children engaged in 5.9 ± 0.9h/day of TPA of which 1.7 ± 0.6h/day was MVPA. Boys engaged in more MVPA and VPA and less SB compared with girls (all p p = 0.017) and locomotor score (β (SE) = 0.7 (0.3), p = 0.018) were associated with more VPA but not with TPA or MVPA. Screen-time and television in the bedroom were not related to SB, TPA, MVPA, or VPA.

Conclusion

Children's motor skills were positively related to VPA but inversely related to screen-time. Further inquiry into the implications of high exposure to screen-time in young children is needed.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.