Study2019Open access

Creatine Supplementation Improves Phosphagen Energy Pathway During Supramaximal Effort, but Does Not Improve Anaerobic Capacity or Performance

de Poli RAB, Roncada LH, Malta ES, Artioli GG, Bertuzzi R, Zagatto AM

Frontiers in physiology · 14 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Grants
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2017/21724‐8); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ((Code 001)); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2016/17836-2)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2019-04-10 · Front Physiol · vol. 10 · p. 352
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Cited
22 citations · more than 75% of similar papers · 1.3× the field average
References
41 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Anaerobic exercise, Creatine, Biology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Physical therapy

6 authors

From BR

  • Rodrigo Araújo Bonetti de PoliUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Luan Henrique RoncadaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Elvis de Souza MaltaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Guilherme Giannini ArtioliUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Rômulo BertuzziUniversidade de São Paulo
  • Alessandro Moura Zagatto · correspondingUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of short-duration creatine monohydrate supplementation on anaerobic capacity (AC), anaerobic energy pathways, and time-to-exhaustion during high-intensity running. Fourteen healthy men underwent a graded exercise test (GXT) followed by a O2max confirmation test, 5 submaximal efforts, and 4 supramaximal running bouts at 115% of V ˙ O2max intensity (the first two supramaximal sessions were applied as familiarization trials) to measure the AC using two procedures; the maximum accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) and non-oxidative pathways energetics sum (AC[La-]+EPOCfast). The investigation was conducted in a single-blind and placebo-controlled manner, with participants performing the efforts first after being supplemented with a placebo (dextrose 20 g⋅day-1 for 5 days), and then, after a 7 day "placebo" washout period, they started the same procedure under creatine supplementation (20 g⋅day-1 for 5 days. This order was chosen due to the prolonged washout of creatine. MAOD was not different between placebo (3.35 ± 0.65 L) and creatine conditions (3.39 ± 0.79 L; P = 0.58) and presented a negligible effect [effect size (ES) = 0.08], similar to, AC[La-]+EPOCfast (placebo condition (3.66 ± 0.79 Land under creatine ingestion 3.82 ± 0.85 L; P = 0.07) presenting a small effect (ES = 0.20). The energetics from the phosphagen pathway increased significantly after creatine supplementation (1.66 ± 0.40 L) compared to the placebo condition (1.55 ± 0.42 L; P = 0.03). However, the glycolytic and oxidative pathways were not different between conditions. Furthermore, time to exhaustion did not differ between placebo (160.79 ± 37.76 s) and creatine conditions (163.64 ± 38.72; P = 0.49). Therefore, we can conclude that creatine supplementation improves the phosphagen energy contribution, but with no statistical effect on AC or time to exhaustion in supramaximal running.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.