Cohort study2019

A Prospective Study of Nut Consumption and Risk of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the U.S. Women and Men

Sui J, Yang W, Ma Y, Li TY, Simon TG, Meyerhardt JA, Liang G, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT, Zhang X

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 19 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
American Cancer Society
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Cancer Institute
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
NCI NIH HHS
Government
NIH
Nonprofit
American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grants
National Cancer Institute (U01 CA167552); National Cancer Institute (R03 CA176717); National Cancer Institute (P01 CA087969); National Cancer Institute (UM1 CA186107); National Cancer Institute (UM1-CA-167552); National Cancer Institute (K07 CA188126); American Cancer Society (RSG130476); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24 [DK]098311); National Institutes of Health (K24 DK098311); National Institutes of Health (K07CA188126)

Based on 8 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2019-04-30 · Cancer Prev Res (Phila) · vol. 12 · issue 6 · pp. 367–374
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research
Cited
23 citations · more than 81% of similar papers · 1.7× the field average
References
57 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Nuts composition and effects · Horticultural and Viticultural Research · Peanut Plant Research Studies
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma, Nut, Medicine, Consumption (sociology), Prospective cohort study, Environmental health, Primary prevention, Oncology, Internal medicine, Demography, Sociology, Disease
MeSH
humans, nuts, carcinoma, hepatocellular, liver neoplasms, prognosis, risk factors, case-control studies, follow-up studies, prospective studies, feeding behavior, adult, aged, middle aged, united states, female, male

10 authors

From US, CN

  • Jing SuiBrigham and Women's Hospital; Southeast University
  • Wanshui YangBrigham and Women's Hospital; Anhui Medical University
  • Yanan MaBrigham and Women's Hospital; China Medical University
  • Tricia Y. LiBrigham and Women's Hospital
  • Tracey G. SimonMassachusetts General Hospital
  • Jeffrey A. MeyerhardtDana-Farber Cancer Institute

Abstract

Although increasing evidence suggests a potential beneficial effect of nut consumption on various diseases, no epidemiologic study has yet examined the association between nut consumption and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We prospectively examined this association in 88,783 women from the Nurses' Health Study and 51,492 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Nut consumption was assessed every 4 years using validated food frequency questionnaires. Multivariable HRs and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models after adjusting for HCC risk factors. After an average of 27.9 years of follow-up, we identified a total of 162 incident HCC cases. Higher total nut consumption was not significantly associated with HCC risk (the highest vs. lowest tertile intake, HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.56-1.26). For the same comparison, higher tree nut consumption was associated with a lower HCC risk (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). We found nonsignificant inverse associations with consumption of walnuts, peanuts, and peanut butter. Overall, nut consumption was not strongly associated with HCC risk. There was a suggestive inverse association with tree nut consumption. Future studies should carefully consider hepatitis B or C virus infections and examine these associations in other racial/ethnic groups.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.