Cohort study2019Open access

Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality: SUN prospective cohort study

Rico-Campà A, Martínez-González MA, Alvarez-Alvarez I, Mendonça RD, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Gómez-Donoso C, Bes-Rastrollo M

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 330 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireFunding not disclosedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-05-29 · BMJ · vol. 365 · p. l1949
Cited
544 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 66.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
51 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
Keywords
Hazard ratio, Medicine, Confidence interval, Prospective cohort study, Proportional hazards model, Cohort, Cohort study, Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Demography, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, incidence, mortality, cause of death, proportional hazards models, risk factors, cohort studies, prospective studies, eating, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, spain, female, male, fast foods, correlation of data

7 authors

From ES, US, BR

  • Anaïs Rico-CampàInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Universidad de Navarra
  • Miguel Ángel Martínez‐GonzálezHarvard University; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Navarre Institute of Health Research; Universidad de Navarra
  • Ismael Álvarez‐ÁlvarezUniversidad de Navarra
  • Raquel de Deus MendonçaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Universidad de Navarra
  • Carmen de la Fuente‐ArrillagaInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Navarre Institute of Health Research; Universidad de Navarra
  • Clara Gómez‐DonosoUniversidad de Navarra

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort of university graduates, Spain 1999-2018.

Participants

19 899 participants (12 113 women and 7786 men) aged 20-91 years followed-up every two years between December 1999 and February 2014 for food and drink consumption, classified according to the degree of processing by the NOVA classification, and evaluated through a validated 136 item food frequency questionnaire.

Main outcome measure

Association between consumption of energy adjusted ultra-processed foods categorised into quarters (low, low-medium, medium-high, and high consumption) and all cause mortality, using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

335 deaths occurred during 200 432 persons years of follow-up. Participants in the highest quarter (high consumption) of ultra-processed foods consumption had a higher hazard for all cause mortality compared with those in the lowest quarter (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.33) with a significant dose-response relation (P for linear trend=0.005). For each additional serving of ultra-processed foods, all cause mortality relatively increased by 18% (adjusted hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.33).

Conclusions

A higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (>4 servings daily) was independently associated with a 62% relatively increased hazard for all cause mortality. For each additional serving of ultra-processed food, all cause mortality increased by 18%.

Study registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02669602.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.