Randomized controlled trial2019

Vitamin D Supplementation and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes

Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B, Sheehan P, Ware JH, Knowler WC, Aroda VR, Brodsky I, Ceglia L, Chadha C, Chatterjee R, Desouza C, Dolor R, Foreyt J, Fuss P, Ghazi A, Hsia DS, Johnson KC, Kashyap SR, Kim S, LeBlanc ES, Lewis MR, Liao E, Neff LM, Nelson J, O'Neil P, Park J, Peters A, Phillips LS, Pratley R, Raskin P, Rasouli N, Robbins D, Rosen C, Vickery EM, Staten M, D2d Research Group

The New England journal of medicine · 451 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
American Diabetes Association
Government
Office of Dietary Supplements
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
NCATS NIH HHS
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grants
American Diabetes Association (1–14-D2d- 01); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001102); Office of Dietary Supplements (U01DK098245); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01 DK098245); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U34DK091958)

Based on 6 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2019-06-07 · N Engl J Med · vol. 381 · issue 6 · pp. 520–530
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Cited
680 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 53.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
38 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Diet and metabolism studies · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Type 2 diabetes, Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Vitamin, Internal medicine, Vitamin D and neurology, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, prediabetic state, cholecalciferol, vitamins, vitamin d, disease-free survival, treatment failure, administration, oral, risk factors, double-blind method, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female, male, kaplan-meier estimate

35 authors

From US, PH

  • Anastassios G. PittasTufts Medical Center
  • Bess Dawson‐HughesTufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
  • Patricia SheehanPsychiatric Rehabilitation Association
  • James H. WareHarvard University
  • William C. KnowlerNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • Vanita R. ArodaBrigham and Women's Hospital

Abstract

Background

Observational studies support an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, whether vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of diabetes is unknown.

Methods

We randomly assigned adults who met at least two of three glycemic criteria for prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose level, 100 to 125 mg per deciliter; plasma glucose level 2 hours after a 75-g oral glucose load, 140 to 199 mg per deciliter; and glycated hemoglobin level, 5.7 to 6.4%) and no diagnostic criteria for diabetes to receive 4000 IU per day of vitamin D3 or placebo, regardless of the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. The primary outcome in this time-to-event analysis was new-onset diabetes, and the trial design was event-driven, with a target number of diabetes events of 508.

Results

A total of 2423 participants underwent randomization (1211 to the vitamin D group and 1212 to the placebo group). By month 24, the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in the vitamin D group was 54.3 ng per milliliter (from 27.7 ng per milliliter at baseline), as compared with 28.8 ng per milliliter in the placebo group (from 28.2 ng per milliliter at baseline). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the primary outcome of diabetes occurred in 293 participants in the vitamin D group and 323 in the placebo group (9.39 and 10.66 events per 100 person-years, respectively). The hazard ratio for vitamin D as compared with placebo was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.04; P = 0.12). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

Among persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D3 supplementation at a dose of 4000 IU per day did not result in a significantly lower risk of diabetes than placebo. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; D2d ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01942694.).

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.