Predicting and Testing Bioavailability of Magnesium Supplements
Blancquaert L, Vervaet C, Derave W
Nutrients · 39 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2019-07-20 · Nutrients · vol. 11 · issue 7 · p. 1663
- Publisher
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Cited
- 67 citations · more than 89% of similar papers · 2.6× the field average
- References
- 34 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Magnesium in Health and Disease · Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
- Keywords
- Bioavailability, In vivo, Magnesium, Pharmacology, Ingestion, Absorption (acoustics), Pharmacokinetics, Chemistry, Medicine, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Biology, Materials science
- MeSH
- humans, magnesium, dosage forms, biological availability, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, female, male, young adult, drug liberation
3 authors
From BE
- Laura BlancquaertGhent University
- Chris VervaetGhent University
- Wim DeraveGhent University
Abstract
Despite the presumption of the beneficial effects of magnesium supplementation, little is known about the pharmacokinetics of different magnesium formulations. We aimed to investigate the value of two in vitro approaches to predict bioavailability of magnesium and to validate this in subsequent in vivo testing. In vitro assessment of 15 commercially available magnesium formulations was performed by means of a Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®) and by dissolution tests. Two magnesium formulations with contrasting bioavailability prediction from both in vitro tests (best vs. worst) were selected for in vivo testing in 30 subjects. In vivo bioavailability was compared following one acute ingestion by monitoring blood magnesium concentrations up to 6 h following intake. The in vitro tests showed a very wide variation in absorption and dissolution of the 15 magnesium products. In the in vivo testing, a significant different serum magnesium absorption profile was found up to 4 h following supplement ingestion for the two supplements with opposing in vitro test results. Moreover, maximal serum magnesium increase and total area under the curve were significantly different for both supplements (+6.2% vs. +4.6% and 6.87 vs. 0.31 mM.min, respectively). Collectively, poor bioaccessibility and bioavailability in the SHIME model clearly translated into poor dissolution and poor bioavailability in vivo. This provides a valid methodology for the prediction of in vivo bioavailability and effectiveness of micronutrients by specific in vitro approaches.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.