Systematic review2019Industry funded

Funded in part by Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, Pharmavite, Meat and Livestock Australia, Servier, DSM, DSM Nutritional Products, Cilag

International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research Practice Guidelines for Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Guu TW, Mischoulon D, Sarris J, Hibbeln J, McNamara RK, Hamazaki K, Freeman MP, Maes M, Matsuoka YJ, Belmaker RH, Jacka F, Pariante C, Berk M, Marx W, Su KP

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 133 citations

Review labels

Industry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Nonprofit
Wilson Foundation
Company
Eli Lilly and Company
Company
Pfizer
Company
Sanofi
University or hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital
Company
Pharmavite
Nonprofit
Geelong Region Medical Research Foundation
Nonprofit
National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Nonprofit
David and Elaine Potter Foundation
Nonprofit
Australian Rotary Health
Nonprofit
Ian Potter Foundation
Industry group
Meat and Livestock Australia
University or hospital
University of Melbourne
Government
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Government
National Health Research Institutes
University or hospital
China Medical University
Company
Servier
University or hospital
China Medical University, Taiwan
Nonprofit
Fernwood Foundation
Company
DSM
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
Medical Research Council
Government
National Health and Medical Research Council
Government
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
University or hospital
Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, University of Wollongong
Company
DSM Nutritional Products
Government
National Institute of Mental Health
Government
Division of Materials Research
Company
Cilag
Grants
National Health Research Institutes (DMR-107-091); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (NHRI-EX106-10528NI); National Health Research Institutes (CRS-108-048); China Medical University, Taiwan (CRS - 108-048); University of Melbourne (1108125); National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX106-10528NI); China Medical University, Taiwan (DMR-107-091); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (105-2918-I-039-001;); China Medical University, Taiwan (DMR-107-202); China Medical University, Taiwan (CRS-106-063); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2314-B039-035); China Medical University, Taiwan (DMR-107-204); National Health Research Institutes (CRS-106-063); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107?); National Health Research Institutes (DMR-107-204); National Health Research Institutes (CRS-106-063, DMR-107-202); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H04253); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2314-B038-049); National Health Research Institutes (DRM-107-097); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST108-2320-B039-048); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2314-B039-027-MY3); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST108-2314-B039-016); National Health Research Institutes (EX106); National Health Research Institutes (DMR-107-202); China Medical University, Taiwan (DRM-107-097); Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST106-2314-B039-031); National Health and Medical Research Council (1108125)

Based on 29 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2019-01-01 · Psychother Psychosom · vol. 88 · issue 5 · pp. 263–273
Publisher
Karger Publishers
Cited
199 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 13.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
85 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency · Diet and metabolism studies · Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
Major depressive disorder, Guideline, Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychopathology, Eicosapentaenoic acid, Polyunsaturated fatty acid, Mood, Fatty acid
MeSH
humans, fatty acids, omega-3, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, antidepressive agents, pregnancy, aged, child, societies, medical, female, biomarkers, major depressive disorder

15 authors

From TW, US, AU, JP, TH, IL, GB

  • Ta‐Wei GuuChina Medical University; China Medical University Beigang Hospital; China Medical University Hospital
  • David MischoulonHarvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Jerome J. SarrisThe University of Melbourne; Westmead Institute; Melbourne Clinic; Western Sydney University
  • Joseph R. HibbelnNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • Robert K. McNamaraUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center
  • Kei HamazakiUniversity of Toyama

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex mental illness with unmet therapeutic needs. The antidepressant effects of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been widely reported. The subcommittee of the International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research organized an expert panel and conducted a literature review and a Delphi process to develop a consensus-based practice guideline for clinical use of n-3 PUFAs in MDD. The guideline focuses on 5 thematic areas: general concepts, acute treatment strategy, depression recurrence monitoring and prevention, use in special populations, and potential safety issues. The key practice guidelines contend that: (1) clinicians and other practitioners are advised to conduct a clinical interview to validate clinical diagnoses, physical conditions, and measurement-based psychopathological assessments in the therapeutic settings when recommending n-3 PUFAs in depression treatment; (2) with respect to formulation and dosage, both pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or an EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) combination of a ratio higher than 2 (EPA/DHA >2) are considered effective, and the recommended dosages should be 1-2 g of net EPA daily, from either pure EPA or an EPA/DHA (>2:1) formula; (3) the quality of n-3 PUFAs may affect therapeutic activity; and (4) potential adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal and dermatological conditions, should be monitored, as well as obtaining comprehensive metabolic panels. The expert consensus panel has agreed on using n-3 PUFAs in MDD treatment for pregnant women, children, and the elderly, and prevention in high-risk populations. Personalizing the clinical application of n-3 PUFAs in subgroups of MDD with a low Omega-3 Index or high levels of inflammatory markers might be regarded as areas that deserve future research.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.