Case-control study2020

Consumption of meat, traditional and modern processed meat and colorectal cancer risk among the Moroccan population: A large-scale case-control study

S Deoula M, El Kinany K, Huybrechts I, Gunter MJ, Hatime Z, Boudouaya HA, Benslimane A, Nejjari C, El Abkari M, Badre W, El Feydi AE, Afkir S, Abda N, El Rhazi K

International journal of cancer · 28 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Case-control study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
World Health Organization

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2019-09-16 · Int J Cancer · vol. 146 · issue 5 · pp. 1333–1345
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
46 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
41 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Red meat, Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Odds ratio, Confounding, White meat, Logistic regression, Case-control study, Confidence interval, Cancer, Internal medicine, Population, Processed meat, Environmental health, Food science, Pathology, Biology
MeSH
animals, poultry, humans, colorectal neoplasms, logistic models, risk, case-control studies, meat, meat products, rural population, urban population, morocco, female, male, red meat

14 authors

From MA, FR, KW

  • Meimouna S. Deoula · correspondingSidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Khaoula El KinanySidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Inge HuybrechtsCentre international de recherche sur le cancer
  • Marc James GunterCentre international de recherche sur le cancer
  • Zineb HatimeSidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
  • Hanae Abir BoudouayaSidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between red and white meat subtypes, processed meat (divided into traditional "Khlii, Kaddid" and industrially processed meat) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, considering CRC subsites, in Moroccan adults. A case-control study was conducted including 2,906 matched case-control pairs recruited from the five largest university hospitals in Morocco. Dietary data were collected through a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariable odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the association of CRC risk with meat consumption (high vs. low intake), were estimated using conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for relevant confounding variables. Overall, consumption of red meat was positively associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05-1.44; OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02-1.27), respectively. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the consumption of red meat and rectal cancer risk (OR = 1.05, 95% = 0.90-1.23). Interestingly, while processed meat from industrial processes was positively associated with colon cancer, rectal cancer and CRC (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.27-2.04; OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.34-2.23; OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.41-1.98), processed meat prepared using traditional methods was inversely associated with colon cancer and CRC risk (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.98; OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93), respectively. Furthermore, positive associations were observed between poultry intake and colon cancer risk among men (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.01-1.59). Our study showed similar associations between the consumption of red meat and CRC risk in Morocco as in developed countries, while inverse associations were found for traditionally processed meat products. This is the first study to investigate the differential effects of traditional vs. westernized processed meat products in a developing country. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings and to understand the physiological pathways underlying these associations.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.