Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
Zeraatkar D, Johnston BC, Bartoszko J, Cheung K, Bala MM, Valli C, Rabassa M, Sit D, Milio K, Sadeghirad B, Agarwal A, Zea AM, Lee Y, Han MA, Vernooij RWM, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, El Dib R
Annals of internal medicine · 80 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2019-10-01 · Ann Intern Med · vol. 171 · issue 10 · pp. 721–731
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Cited
- 133 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 17.4× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 68 works
- Access
- Open access (repository copy) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Keywords
- Medicine, Cancer, Red meat, Internal medicine, Food science, Environmental health, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diet, randomized controlled trials as topic, red meat
18 authors
From CA, PL, US, ES, KR, NL, BR
- Dena ZeraatkarMcMaster University
- Bradley C. JohnstonMcMaster University
- Jessica Julia BartoszkoMcMaster University
- Kevin J. CheungMcMaster University
- Małgorzata Maria BałaJagiellonian University
- Claudia ValliBiomedical Research Institute; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
Abstract
This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement.
Background
Few randomized trials have evaluated the effect of reducing red meat intake on clinically important outcomes.
Purpose
To summarize the effect of lower versus higher red meat intake on the incidence of cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes in adults.
Data sources
EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest from inception to July 2018 and MEDLINE from inception to April 2019, without language restrictions.
Study selection
Randomized trials (published in any language) comparing diets lower in red meat with diets higher in red meat that differed by a gradient of at least 1 serving per week for 6 months or more.
Data extraction
Teams of 2 reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence.
Data synthesis
Of 12 eligible trials, a single trial enrolling 48 835 women provided the most credible, though still low-certainty, evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.91 to 1.06]), and cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). That trial also provided low- to very-low-certainty evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on total cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) and the incidence of cancer, including colorectal cancer (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.90 to 1.20]) and breast cancer (HR, 0.97 [0.90 to 1.04]).
Limitations
There were few trials, most addressing only surrogate outcomes, with heterogeneous comparators and small gradients in red meat consumption between lower versus higher intake groups.
Conclusion
Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.
Primary funding source
None (PROSPERO: CRD42017074074).
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.