Randomized controlled trial2020Open access

Partial-body cryotherapy (-135°C) and cold-water immersion (10°C) after muscle damage in females

Hohenauer E, Costello JT, Deliens T, Clarys P, Stoop R, Clijsen R

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 41 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-11-02 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 30 · issue 3 · pp. 485–495
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
56 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.3× the field average
References
42 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
Cryotherapy, Medicine, Isometric exercise, Anesthesia, Surgery, Internal medicine
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, water, cryotherapy, immersion, skin temperature, isometric contraction, adult, female, cold temperature, young adult, myalgia

6 authors

From BE, CH, GB

  • Erich Hohenauer · correspondingVrije Universiteit Brussel; University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland; THIM van der Laan University College Physiotherapy
  • Joseph T. CostelloUniversity of Portsmouth
  • Tom DeliensVrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Peter ClarysVrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Rahel StoopUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland; THIM van der Laan University College Physiotherapy
  • Ron ClijsenVrije Universiteit Brussel; University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland; THIM van der Laan University College Physiotherapy

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI), partial-body cryotherapy (PBC), or a passive control (CON) on physiological and recovery variables following exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD, 5 × 20 drop jumps) in females. Twenty-eight females were allocated to PBC (30 seconds at -60°C, 2 minutes at -135°C), CWI (10 minutes at 10°C), or CON (10 minutes resting). Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2 ), cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and local skin temperature were assessed at baseline and through 60 minutes (10-minute intervals), while delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS), muscle swelling, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and vertical jump performance (VJP) were assessed up to 72 hours (24-hour intervals) following treatments. SmO2 was lower in PBC (Δ-2.77 ± 13.08%) and CWI (Δ-5.91 ± 11.80%) compared with CON (Δ18.96 ± 1.46%) throughout the 60-minute follow-up period (P < .001). CVC was lower from PBC (92.7 ± 25.0%, 90.5 ± 23.4%) and CWI (90.3 ± 23.5%, 88.1 ± 22.9%) compared with CON (119.0 ± 5.1 and 116.1 ± 6.6%, respectively) between 20 and 30 minutes (P < .05). Mean skin temperature was lower from CWI vs PBC (between 10 and 40 minutes, P < .05). Mean skin temperature was higher in CON compared with CWI up to 60 minutes and compared with PBC up to 30 minutes (P < .05). DOMS was lower following both PBC and CWI compared with CON through 72-hour (P < .05), with no difference between groups. No main group differences for swelling, MVIC, and VJP were observed. In conclusion, CWI elicited generally greater physiological effects compared with PBC while both interventions were more effective than CON in reducing DOMS in females, but had no effect on functional measures or swelling.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.