Systematic review2019

Photobiomodulation in Oral Surgery: A Review

Hosseinpour S, Tunér J, Fekrazad R

Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery · 33 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-11-21 · Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · vol. 37 · issue 12 · pp. 814–825
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Cited
55 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
73 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Keywords
Trismus, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Dentistry, Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral Surgical Procedures, MEDLINE, Clinical trial, Web of science, Randomized controlled trial, Surgery, Meta-analysis, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, surgery, oral, low-level light therapy

3 authors

From AU, IR

  • Sepanta HosseinpourThe University of Queensland
  • Jan Tunér
  • Reza Fekrazad · correspondingAja University of Medical Sciences; Universal Scientific Education and Research Network

Abstract

Objective: This article presents a review of current data on the applications of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), to guide future research. Background data: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been reported to be effective for various postoperative conditions, including pain relief, improvement of mastication, neurosensory recovery, and wound healing. There is a need for identifying the therapeutic irradiation windows for these conditions, based upon the available literature. Materials and methods: All original articles related to PBM for oral surgery in MEDLINE (NCBI PubMed and PMC), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were reviewed until December 2018. Results: Forty-six clinical trials were included in this study. These trials were categorized into three different types of PBM applications. After reviewing all these studies, the most effective physical properties for PBM pain reduction after tooth extraction were as follows: wavelength 650-980 nm; power 4-300 mW; and energy density 3-85.7 J/cm2. PBMT at 660-910 nm with 4-500 mW power and 2-480 J/cm2 energy density was effective for decreasing facial swelling. At the same wavelength and power range with 4-106 J/cm2 energy density, PBM was effective for alleviating trismus after tooth extraction. Conclusions: Most papers suggested that PBM seemed to be effective in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar tooth extraction, neurosensory and nerve recovery after mandibular ramus osteotomy. The heterogeneity of the standardization regarding the parameters of laser calls for caution in interpretation of these results. However, this evidence-based review regarding the best protocols for OMFS applications can be beneficial for both future research and clinical applications.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.