Photobiomodulation in Oral Surgery: A Review
Hosseinpour S, Tunér J, Fekrazad R
Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery · 33 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2019-11-21 · Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · vol. 37 · issue 12 · pp. 814–825
- Publisher
- Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- Cited
- 55 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.7× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 73 works
- Access
- Free to read
- Research areas
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
- Keywords
- Trismus, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Dentistry, Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral Surgical Procedures, MEDLINE, Clinical trial, Web of science, Randomized controlled trial, Surgery, Meta-analysis, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, surgery, oral, low-level light therapy
3 authors
From AU, IR
- Sepanta HosseinpourThe University of Queensland
- Jan Tunér
- Reza Fekrazad · correspondingAja University of Medical Sciences; Universal Scientific Education and Research Network
Abstract
Objective: This article presents a review of current data on the applications of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), to guide future research. Background data: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been reported to be effective for various postoperative conditions, including pain relief, improvement of mastication, neurosensory recovery, and wound healing. There is a need for identifying the therapeutic irradiation windows for these conditions, based upon the available literature. Materials and methods: All original articles related to PBM for oral surgery in MEDLINE (NCBI PubMed and PMC), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were reviewed until December 2018. Results: Forty-six clinical trials were included in this study. These trials were categorized into three different types of PBM applications. After reviewing all these studies, the most effective physical properties for PBM pain reduction after tooth extraction were as follows: wavelength 650-980 nm; power 4-300 mW; and energy density 3-85.7 J/cm2. PBMT at 660-910 nm with 4-500 mW power and 2-480 J/cm2 energy density was effective for decreasing facial swelling. At the same wavelength and power range with 4-106 J/cm2 energy density, PBM was effective for alleviating trismus after tooth extraction. Conclusions: Most papers suggested that PBM seemed to be effective in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar tooth extraction, neurosensory and nerve recovery after mandibular ramus osteotomy. The heterogeneity of the standardization regarding the parameters of laser calls for caution in interpretation of these results. However, this evidence-based review regarding the best protocols for OMFS applications can be beneficial for both future research and clinical applications.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.