Systematic review2019

Systematic Review of Orthodontic Treatment Management with Photobiomodulation Therapy

Cronshaw M, Parker S, Anagnostaki E, Lynch E

Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery · 31 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2019-11-22 · Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · vol. 37 · issue 12 · pp. 862–868
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Cited
56 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 1.8× the field average
References
53 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, MEDLINE, Dentistry, Laser therapy, Low level laser therapy, Physical therapy, Systematic review, Surgery, Pathology
MeSH
humans, orthodontics, low-level light therapy

4 authors

From IT, US

  • Mark Cronshaw · correspondingUniversity of Genoa
  • Steven P. A. ParkerUniversity of Genoa
  • Eugenia AnagnostakiUniversity of Genoa
  • Edward J. LynchUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review of published research evaluates the parameters and reported outcomes in photobiomodulation therapies (PBMTs) used in management of pain and accelerated tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Background: Consequent to positive in vitro and animal studies, there has been considerable interest in the potential applications of PBMT to ameliorate pain and to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Due to the lack of consistency of wavelengths and parameters applied, there is as yet no consensus in respect of guidance for clinical use. Within the limitations of the reported literature, a digest of key outcomes and parameters is presented here to assist researchers and interested clinicians. Materials and methods: Search engines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, were applied to identify clinical investigations into the potential benefits of PBMTs in orthodontic management. Keywords used were "low-level laser therapy," "low-level light therapy," "photobiomodulation," "orthodontics," "pain," "tooth movement," and "randomized clinical trial ≥5 years." A total of 35 articles were identified, covering the 5-year period January 2013 to December 2018. Only human clinical trials were considered. Seventeen articles were included in this investigation and the reported parameters and outcomes were assessed and presented for comparison. Results: Seven of nine studies supported the effectiveness of PBMT to reduce or prevent pain. There was no consensus on choice of wavelength and a range of parameters were found beneficial. Of the seven tooth movement studies included, four of the seven were positive, of which two used a home-use light-emitting diode (LED) device, as opposed to a clinician-applied laser. A variety of wavelengths and parameters were found to be effective in accelerating tooth movement in the range of 20-40% compared with control. Conclusions: Due to a lack of consistency in approach, further studies are required to achieve a high level of acceptance. The clinical logistics associated with frequent applications supports the concept of patient home delivery use of LED devices, although there are insufficient studies at present to make an evidence-based determination of this type of appliance. To gain more general professional acceptance of the use of PBMT in orthodontics, a continued effort to extend the number of quality human clinical trials is required. Based on the current evidence base, further positive onward progression can be regarded as inevitable.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.