Study2020
Controversial red meat study adds correction over undisclosed industry funding
Dyer O
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2 citations
Review labels
Funding not disclosedLumps processed with unprocessed meat
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Expert or government fact sheet (classified by our AI screen)
- Main outcome
- No health outcome
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2020-01-10 · BMJ · vol. 368 · p. m111
- Cited
- 4 citations · more than 68% of similar papers · 0.5× the field average
- References
- 5 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- Computer science, Meat packing industry, Data science, Business, Food science, Chemistry
1 author
- Owen Dyer · corresponding
Abstract
Europe PMC has no abstract for this paper. Open the source to read it.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
0 · not at all10 · completely
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.