Study2020Open access

Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Firefighter Exposures

Burgess JL, Hoppe-Jones C, Griffin SC, Zhou JJ, Gulotta JJ, Wallentine DD, Moore PK, Valliere EA, Weller SR, Beitel SC, Flahr LM, Littau SR, Dearmon-Moore D, Zhai J, Jung AM, Garavito F, Snyder SA

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 19 citations

Review labels

Mechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
FEMA DHS

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2020-01-24 · J Occup Environ Med · vol. 62 · issue 4 · pp. 279–288
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
26 citations · more than 97% of similar papers · 6.8× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Occupational Health and Performance · Fire dynamics and safety research · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
Psychological intervention, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Personal protective equipment, Urinary system, Occupational exposure, Toxicology, Physical therapy, Environmental health, Surgery, Internal medicine, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
MeSH
skin, humans, air pollutants, occupational, environmental monitoring, occupational exposure, firefighters, personal protective equipment, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

17 authors

From DE, US

  • Jefferey L. Burgess · correspondingJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College
  • Christiane Hoppe‐JonesJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College
  • Stephanie C. GriffinJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College
  • Jin ZhouJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College
  • John J. GulottaJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College
  • Darin D. WallentineJungheinrich (Germany); University of Arizona; Western Texas College

Abstract

Objective

Evaluate the effectiveness of firefighter exposure reduction interventions.

Methods

Fireground interventions included use of self-contained breathing apparatus by engineers, entry team wash down, contaminated equipment isolation, and personnel showering and washing of gear upon return to station. Urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites (PAH-OHs) were measured after structural fire responses before and after intervention implementation. Separately, infrared sauna use following live-fire training was compared to standard postfire care in a randomized trial.

Results

The fireground interventions significantly reduced mean total urinary postfire PAH-OHs in engineers (-40.4%, 95%CI -63.9%, -2.3%) and firefighters (-36.2%, 95%CI -56.7%, -6.0%) but not captains (-11.3% 95%CI -39.4%, 29.9%). Sauna treatment non-significantly reduced total mean PAH-OHs by -43.5% (95%CI -68.8%, 2.2%).

Conclusions

The selected fireground interventions reduced urinary PAH-OHs in engineers and firefighters. Further evaluation of infrared sauna treatment is needed.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.