NutriRECS Consortium provides weak recommendations for continuing current red meat and processed meat consumption

Review labels

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design

Expert or government fact sheet (classified by our AI screen)

Main outcome

Clinical events such as disease or death

Intake measured by

Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding

Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published

2020-02-01 · Ann Intern Med · vol. 172 · issue 4 · p. JC15

Publisher

American College of Physicians

Cited

2 citations · more than 63% of similar papers · 0.3× the field average

References

4 works

Access

Paywalled

Research areas

Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Keywords

Medicine, Red meat, Processed meat, Food science, Consumption (sociology), Guideline, Pathology

MeSH

nutrition policy, meat, red meat

2 authors

From US

• Jackie West-DenningUniversity of Colorado Denver
• Allan V. ProchazkaUniversity of Colorado Denver

Abstract

Europe PMC has no abstract for this paper. Open the source to read it.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

Comments

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.