Funded in part by GlaxoSmithKline
The Effects of Cruciferous Vegetable-Enriched Diets on Drug Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Dietary Intervention Trials in Humans
Eagles SK, Gross AS, McLachlan AJ
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 13 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Mechanisms only
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Industry funded
- Company
- GlaxoSmithKline
Based on 1 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2020-02-22 · Clin Pharmacol Ther · vol. 108 · issue 2 · pp. 212–227
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Cited
- 39 citations · more than 54% of similar papers · 0.5× the field average
- References
- 70 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms · Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- Cruciferous vegetables, Meta-analysis, Drug, Medicine, Context (archaeology), CYP1A2, Pharmacology, Drug metabolism, Biology, Internal medicine, Cytochrome P450, Metabolism
- MeSH
- humans, brassicaceae, vegetables, cytochrome p-450 cyp1a2, isoenzymes, glutathione transferase, pharmaceutical preparations, diet, risk assessment, risk factors, substrate specificity, nutritive value, food-drug interactions, metabolic detoxication, phase i, metabolic detoxication, phase ii, clinical trials as topic
3 authors
From AU
- Shane K. EaglesThe University of Sydney; Concord Repatriation General Hospital
- Annette S. GrossThe University of Sydney; GlaxoSmithKline (Australia)
- Andrew J. McLachlan · correspondingThe University of Sydney; Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Abstract
Relatively few studies exist in the literature that discuss the effects of diet on drug metabolism and how this can affect interindividual differences in systemic drug exposure. Several studies have investigated the effects of cruciferous vegetables (Cruciferae) or their constituents on drug-metabolizing activity, as these vegetables form an important part of many peoples' diets. In general, the ingestion of cruciferous vegetables is associated with induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 activity in vivo; however, there is contention between reports, and the clinical significance of potential diet-drug interactions remains unclear. This study reports a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis of the published literature in this area, and discusses the clinical significance of Cruciferae-enriched diets in the context of diet-drug interactions. Twenty-three dietary intervention trials with drug metabolism end points were identified across Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL). Cruciferous vegetables represented in the literature included broccoli, Brussels sprout, cabbage, cauliflower, radish, and watercress. A range of phase I and II drug-metabolizing enzymes and phenotyping metrics were represented in the literature. The meta-analyses performed demonstrated a significant effect on CYP1A2 and glutathione S-transferase-alpha (GST-α), with consumption of Cruciferae increasing the activities of these enzymes by 20-40% and 15-35%, respectively. The results herein suggest that patients undergoing pharmacotherapy with CYP1A2 or GST-α substrates could have altered drug exposure profiles if they regularly eat large or variable amounts of cruciferous vegetables. Recommendations regarding the design of future randomized, controlled trials to test hypotheses in this area are included.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.