Cross-sectional study2020

Gender Differences in the Response to Short-term Cold Exposure in Young Adults

Mengel LA, Seidl H, Brandl B, Skurk T, Holzapfel C, Stecher L, Claussnitzer M, Hauner H

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 25 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Possibly industry funded
Unclassified
Bad Homburg.
Company
Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung, Bad Homburg
University or hospital
ZIEL-Institute for Food and Health

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-03-07 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · vol. 105 · issue 5 · pp. e1938–e1948
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
33 citations · more than 86% of similar papers · 1.9× the field average
References
71 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Adipose Tissue and Metabolism · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Thermogenesis, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Context (archaeology), Basal metabolic rate, Adiponectin, Medicine, Resting energy expenditure, Body mass index, Leptin, Brown adipose tissue, Hormone, Energy metabolism, Young adult, Adipose tissue, Obesity, Biology, Insulin resistance
MeSH
humans, leptin, blood glucose, basal metabolism, cross-sectional studies, adaptation, physiological, body composition, energy metabolism, thermogenesis, sex characteristics, adult, female, male, adiponectin, adipose tissue, brown, cold temperature, young adult

8 authors

From DE, US

  • Laura Aline MengelTechnical University of Munich
  • Hatti SeidlTechnical University of Munich
  • Beate BrandlTechnical University of Munich
  • Thomas SkurkTechnical University of Munich
  • Christina M. HolzapfelTechnical University of Munich
  • Lynne StecherTechnical University of Munich

Abstract

Context

Cold exposure (CE) has been shown to enhance energy expenditure by activating brown adipose tissue thermogenesis and metabolism in humans. However, it remains to be elucidated if there are gender-specific differences in cold-induced thermogenesis and metabolism.

Objective

To study the impact of mild CE on resting energy expenditure (REE) and metabolism in males compared with females.

Setting

A cross-sectional study.

Participants

117 healthy young Caucasians participated in this study (58 males). Mean age was 25.1 ± 3.6 years and mean body mass index 22.3 ± 1.7 kg/m2.

Intervention

Participants underwent a short-term CE using water perfused mattresses to activate nonshivering thermogenesis.

Main outcome measures

REE was assessed before and 2 hours after CE followed by blood sampling. Selected metabolites and hormones were measured. Skin temperatures were monitored at various sites throughout the experiment.

Results

Participants showed a significant increase in REE after CE (6.5%, P < .001). This increase did not differ between genders (P = .908). However, there were differences between males and females in changes of plasma glucose (-5.1% versus -7.4%, P = .024), leptin (-14.3% versus -30.1%, P < .001) and adiponectin (5.4% versus 12.8%, P = .018) after CE. We observed a significant decrease of the supraclavicular skin temperature in men (-0.3%, P = .034), but not in women (0.3%, P = .326)(P = .019 between genders).

Conclusions

We did not observe a difference in the thermogenic response, measured as change of REE, to CE in women compared with men. However, we found that some metabolic and hormonal changes were more pronounced in women than in men suggesting a gender-specific response to cold.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.