Study2020Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by International Nut and Dried Fruit Council

Nut consumption in a representative survey of Australians: a secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey

Nikodijevic CJ, Probst YC, Batterham MJ, Tapsell LC, Neale EP

Public health nutrition · 22 citations

Review labels

Industry fundedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Industry group
International Nut and Dried Fruit Council

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-03-10 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 23 · issue 18 · pp. 3368–3378
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
28 citations · more than 84% of similar papers · 1.8× the field average
References
45 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Nuts composition and effects · Peanut Plant Research Studies · Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Keywords
Physical activity, Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Nut, Gerontology, Geography, Medicine, Sociology, Physical therapy, Engineering, Social science
MeSH
humans, nuts, anthropometry, exercise, diet, nutrition surveys, blood pressure, adult, middle aged, australia

5 authors

From AU

  • Cassandra J. NikodijevicUniversity of Wollongong
  • Yasmine ProbstUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Marijka Jane BatterhamUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Linda C TapsellUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Elizabeth Phillipa Neale · correspondingUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute

Abstract

Objective

Nut consumption is associated with a range of health benefits. The current study aimed to examine nut consumption in the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS) and to investigate associations between nut intake, nutrient intake and anthropometric and blood pressure measurements.

Design

Secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 NNPAS. Usual consumption of nuts in the 2011-2012 NNPAS was determined, and nut consumption was compared with population recommendations of 30 g nuts per day. The relationship between nut consumption and intakes of key nutrients, anthropometric outcomes (weight, BMI and waist circumference) and blood pressure was examined using linear regression for participants aged over 18 years.

Setting

Australia.

Participants

Australians (2 years and older, n 12 153) participating in the representative 2011-2012 NNPAS.

Results

Mean nut intake was 4·61 (95 % CI: 4·36, 4·86) g/d, with only 5·6 % of nut consumers consuming 30 g of nuts per day. Nut consumption was associated with significantly greater intakes of fibre, vitamin E, Fe, Mg and P. There was no association between nut consumption and body weight, BMI, waist circumference, or blood pressure.

Conclusions

Exploration of nut consumption in a representative sample of Australians identified that nut intake does not meet recommendations. Higher nut consumption was not adversely associated with higher body weight, aligning with the current evidence base. Given the current levels of nut consumption in Australia, strategies to increase nut intake to recommended levels are required.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.