Cross-sectional study2020

Whole grain intake compared with cereal fibre intake in association to CVD risk factors: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (UK)

Barrett EM, Amoutzopoulos B, Batterham MJ, Ray S, Beck EJ

Public health nutrition · 22 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Australian Government

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2020-03-19 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 23 · issue 8 · pp. 1392–1403
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
25 citations · more than 82% of similar papers · 1.6× the field average
References
47 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Celiac Disease Research and Management
Keywords
Quartile, Medicine, Whole grains, Cross-sectional study, Homocysteine, Waist, Refined grains, Dietary fibre, Body mass index, Breakfast cereal, Animal science, Food science, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Biology, Confidence interval
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, c-reactive protein, diet, nutrition surveys, risk factors, cross-sectional studies, dietary fiber, adult, edible grain, whole grains, united kingdom, glycated hemoglobin

5 authors

From AU, GB

  • Eden M. Barrett · correspondingUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Birdem AmoutzopoulosMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory; University of Cambridge; MRC Epidemiology Unit
  • Marijka Jane BatterhamUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Sumantra RayMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory; British Dietetic Association; Cambridge University Health Partners
  • Eleanor J. BeckUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute

Abstract

Objective

To investigate how intakes of whole grains and cereal fibre were associated to risk factors for CVD in UK adults.

Design

Cross-sectional analyses examined associations between whole grain and cereal fibre intakes and adiposity measurements, serum lipid concentrations, C-reactive protein, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, HbA1c, homocysteine and a combined CVD relative risk score.

Setting

The National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Rolling Programme 2008-2014.

Participants

A nationally representative sample of 2689 adults.

Results

Participants in the highest quartile (Q4) of whole grain intake had lower waist-hip ratio (Q1 0·872; Q4 0·857; P = 0·04), HbA1c (Q1 5·66 %; Q4 5·47 %; P = 0·01) and homocysteine (Q1 9·95 µmol/l; Q4 8·76 µmol/l; P = 0·01) compared with participants in the lowest quartile (Q1), after adjusting for dietary and lifestyle factors, including cereal fibre intake. Whole grain intake was inversely associated with C-reactive protein using multivariate analysis (P = 0·02), but this was not significant after final adjustment for cereal fibre. Cereal fibre intake was also inversely associated with waist-hip ratio (P = 0·03) and homocysteine (P = 0·002) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Similar inverse associations between whole grain and cereal fibre intakes to CVD risk factors suggest the relevance of cereal fibre in the protective effects of whole grains. However, whole grain associations often remained significant after adjusting for cereal fibre intake, suggesting additional constituents may be relevant. Intervention studies are needed to compare cereal fibre intake from non-whole grain sources to whole grain intake.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.