Randomized controlled trial2020Open access

Magnesium supplementation and preeclampsia in low-income pregnant women - a randomized double-blind clinical trial

de Araújo CAL, de Sousa Oliveira L, de Gusmão IMB, Guimarães A, Ribeiro M, Alves JGB

BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 19 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Government
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Nonprofit
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Nonprofit
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Government
CNPq
Grants
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (4399862016-8); Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1107597); Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (4399862016-8)

Based on 5 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2020-04-09 · BMC Pregnancy Childbirth · vol. 20 · issue 1 · p. 208
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
28 citations · more than 89% of similar papers · 1.7× the field average
References
26 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies · Magnesium in Health and Disease · Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
Medicine, Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Placebo, Randomized controlled trial, Population, Incidence (geometry), Randomization, Gynecology, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, pre-eclampsia, magnesium deficiency, magnesium sulfate, double-blind method, gestational age, pregnancy, poverty, dietary supplements, adult, brazil, female, young adult

6 authors

From BR

  • Carla Adriane Leal de AraújoInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
  • Larissa de Sousa OliveiraFaculdade Frassinetti do Recife; Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde
  • Isabela Melo Buarque de GusmãoFaculdade Frassinetti do Recife; Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde
  • Angélica GuimarãesFundacao Joaquim Nabuco
  • Moranna RibeiroInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
  • João Guilherme Bezerra Alves · correspondingInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira

Abstract

Background

Preeclampsia is the major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Magnesium sulfate is considered first-line therapy against eclampsia and magnesium deficiency in pregnancy has been associated with unfavourable perinatal outcomes. However there are doubts if magnesium supplementation during pregnancy can previne preeclampsia especially in population with high nutritional risk. This trial aims to verify the effect of oral magnesium supplmentation on preeclampsia incidence in low income pregnant women.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effect of oral magnesium citrate supplementation for preeclampsia in low-income Brazilian pregnant women, i.e. annual per capita income of US$ 1025 or less. Participants were admitted to the study with gestational age between 12 and 20 weeks. Magnesium serum level was measured pre-randomization and participants with hypermagnesemia were excluded. After randomizationg participants received magnesium citrate capsule (300 mg magnesium citrate) or a daily placebo capsule, until delivery. Intent-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 416 pregnant women were screened and 318 enrolled according to the inclusion criteria; 159 for each arm. Twenty-eight pregnant women were lost to follow-up. 55/290 (18.9%) of pregnant women developed preeclampsia; 26/143 (18.1%) in magnesium group and 29/147 (19.7%) in the control group; OR 0.90 (CI 95% 0.48-1.69), p = 0.747. No cases of eclampsia were registered.

Conclusion

Oral magnesium supplementation did not reduce preeclampsia incidence in low-income and low-risk pregnant women.

Trial registration

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT02032186), December 19, 2013.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.