Study2020Open access

Use and abuse of dietary supplements in persons with diabetes

Hannon BA, Fairfield WD, Adams B, Kyle T, Crow M, Thomas DM

Nutrition & diabetes · 41 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2020-04-27 · Nutr Diabetes · vol. 10 · issue 1 · p. 14
Publisher
Springer Nature
Cited
62 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
45 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, MEDLINE, Family medicine, Gerontology, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus, type 1, diabetes mellitus, type 2, selenium, zinc, vitamins, united states food and drug administration, dietary fiber, dietary supplements, united states

6 authors

From US

  • Bridget A. HannonUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • William D. FairfieldUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • Bryan E. AdamsUnited States Military Academy
  • Theodore K. Kyle
  • Mason CrowUnited States Military Academy
  • Diana Maria Thomas · correspondingUnited States Military Academy

Abstract

The dietary supplement industry has estimated sales of over $30 billion in the US and over $100 billion globally. Many consumers believe that dietary supplements are safer and possibly more effective than drugs to treat diabetes. The sheer volume of the literature in this space makes compiling them into one review challenging, so much so that primarily narrative reviews currently exist. By applying the interactive database supplied by the Office of Dietary Supplements at the National Institutes of Health, we identified the top 100 ingredients that appeared most often in dietary supplement products. One-hundred different keyword searches using the ingredient name and the word diabetes were performed using a program developed to automatically scrape PubMed. Each search was retained in a separate Excel spreadsheet, which was then reviewed for inclusion or exclusion. The studies that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for effect of reducing and controlling diabetes. The PubMed scrape resulted in 6217 studies. For each keyword search only the most recent 100 were retained, which refined the total to 1823 studies. Of these 425 met the screening criteria. The ingredients, fiber, selenium and zinc had the most studies associated with improvement in diabetes. Several popular supplement ingredients (phosphorus, pantothenic acid, calcium, magnesium, glutamine, isoleucine, tyrosine, choline, and creatine monohydrate) did not result in any studies meeting our screening criteria. Our study demonstrates how to automate reviews to filter and collapse literature in content areas that have an enormous volume of studies. The aggregated set of studies suggest there is little clinical evidence for the use of dietary supplements to reduce or control diabetes.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.