Study2020

Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle perfusion following different degrees of cold-water immersion

Mawhinney C, Heinonen I, Low DA, Han C, Jones H, Kalliokoski KK, Kirjavainen A, Kemppainen J, Di Salvo V, Weston M, Cable T, Gregson W

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 17 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosedMechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
In vitro/mechanistic study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2020-04-30 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 128 · issue 5 · pp. 1392–1401
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
25 citations · more than 82% of similar papers · 1.5× the field average
References
51 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Keywords
Perfusion, Quadriceps muscle, Quadriceps femoris muscle, Medicine, Anatomy, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Isometric exercise
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, water, immersion, perfusion, male, quadriceps muscle, cold temperature

12 authors

From TH, GB, FI, SE, QA

  • Chris MawhinneyMahidol University; Liverpool John Moores University
  • Ilkka HeinonenUniversity of Turku; Turku University Hospital; Turku PET Centre; Halmstad University
  • David A. LowLiverpool John Moores University
  • Chunlei HanUniversity of Turku; Turku University Hospital; Turku PET Centre
  • Helen E JonesLiverpool John Moores University
  • Kari K. KalliokoskiUniversity of Turku; Turku University Hospital; Turku PET Centre

Abstract

We examined the influence of graded cold-water immersion (CWI) on global and regional quadriceps muscle perfusion with positron emission tomography (PET) and [15O]H2O. In 30 healthy men [33 ± 8 yr; 81 ± 10 kg; 184 ± 5 cm; percentage body fat: 13 ± 5%; peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak): 47 ± 8 mL·kg-1·min-1] quadriceps perfusion, thigh and calf cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), intestinal, muscle, and local skin temperatures, thermal comfort, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were assessed before and after 10 min of CWI at 8°C, 15°C, or 22°C. Global quadriceps perfusion did not change beyond a clinically relevant threshold (0.75 mL·100 g·min-1) in any condition and was similar between conditions {range of differences [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.1 mL·100 g·min-1 (-0.9 to 1.2 mL·100 g·min-1) to 0.9 mL·100 g·min-1 (-0.2 to 1.9 mL·100 g·min-1)}. Muscle perfusion was greater in vastus intermedius (VI) compared with vastus lateralis (VL) (2.2 mL·100 g·min-1; 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0 mL·100 g·min-1) and rectus femoris (RF) (2.2 mL·100 g·min-1; 1.4 to 2.9 mL·100 g·min-1). A clinically relevant increase in VI muscle perfusion after immersion at 8°C and a decrease in RF muscle perfusion at 15°C were observed. A clinically relevant increase in perfusion was observed in VI in 8°C compared with 22°C water (2.3 mL·100 g·min-1; 1.1 to 3.5 mL·100 g·min-1). There were no clinically relevant between-condition differences in thigh CVC. Our findings suggest that CWI (8-22°C) does not reduce global quadriceps muscle perfusion to a clinically relevant extent; however, colder water increases (8°C) deep muscle perfusion and reduces (15°C) superficial muscle (RF) perfusion in the quadriceps muscle.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using positron emission tomography, we report for the first time muscle perfusion heterogeneity in the quadriceps femoris in response to different degrees of cold-water immersion (CWI). Noxious CWI temperatures (8°C) increase perfusion in the deep quadriceps muscle, whereas superficial quadriceps muscle perfusion is reduced in cooler (15°C) water. Therefore, these data have important implications for the selection of CWI approaches used in the treatment of soft tissue injury, while also increasing our understanding of the potential mechanisms underpinning CWI.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.